Interesting Interpretation

[David]

May have to try this tomorrow, but maybe on something with cheaper parts....

http://blog.princelaw.com/2014/05/14/did-atfs-determination-on-nics-checks-open-the-door-for-manufacture-of-new-machineguns-for-trusts/

Really, though I think the ATF will shut that interpretation down. Lol

[phaux]

May have to try this tomorrow, but maybe on something with cheaper parts....

http://blog.princelaw.com/2014/05/14/did-atfs-determination-on-nics-checks-open-the-door-for-manufacture-of-new-machineguns-for-trusts/

Really, though I think the ATF will shut that interpretation down. Lol

I'm down.... I'll submit a handful of lowers and see what happens

[KBScobravert]

Hahaha, interesting. I would love to be able to manufacture a lower into a full auto.

[KBScobravert]

Thinking more about this. Wouldn't this also mean that the Trust could manufacturer SBRs without the stamp also?

[Nash B.]

Thinking more about this. Wouldn't this also mean that the Trust could manufacturer SBRs without the stamp also?

How?

[slow06]

How?

I didn't look it up, but I think he is insinuating the law says something to the effect of "no person may manufacture or own an SBR" like it does for machineguns.