Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Supreme Court: Warrants needed in GPS tracking

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • #31
    Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
    Cases like this just illustrate to me why the police can't be trusted with certain powers. If it can be abused, it will be abused. If it can be tested, it will be tested. Morality, conscience or common sense be damned. While the problem is with lawmakers, they aren't the ones who test the courts to see what they can get away with.
    Cases like this?

    Did you read the decision?

    U.S. Reports
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf
    Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court, Supreme Court of US, Supremecourt, United State Supreme Court, US Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, Court, Bound Volumes, United States Reports


    This GPS lead to the stash house with $850,000 cash, 97 kilograms of cocaine, and 1 kilogram of cocaine base.

    It's not like they were tracking a guy with a blunt and the munchies.

    Comment

    • #32
      Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
      Cases like this?

      Did you read the decision?

      U.S. Reports
      http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf
      Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court, Supreme Court of US, Supremecourt, United State Supreme Court, US Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, Court, Bound Volumes, United States Reports


      This GPS lead to the stash house with $850,000 cash, 97 kilograms of cocaine, and 1 kilogram of cocaine base.

      It's not like they were tracking a guy with a blunt and the munchies.
      I wouldn't care if they were tracking Charles Manson.
      Originally posted by racrguy
      What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
      Originally posted by racrguy
      Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

      Comment

      • #33
        Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
        I wouldn't care if they were tracking Charles Manson.

        They can't track Manson Al. He's on death row duh... lol



        At least all that dope is off the streets. Wonder if the money remains seized?
        www.allforoneroofing.com

        Comment

        • #34
          Originally posted by mikec View Post
          They can't track Manson Al. He's on death row duh... lol



          At least all that dope is off the streets. Wonder if the money remains seized?
          That isn't the real Charles Manson dude, he's an impostor. I thought everyone knew that!
          Originally posted by racrguy
          What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
          Originally posted by racrguy
          Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

          Comment

          • #35
            Each one of us has our own point of view about this issue. Individual reacts in this particular topic in a different ways that's why there are arguments. But I think we should just respect the law to avoid troubles. Some think a unanimous Supreme Court decision Monday does not go far enough. The court ruled that police are limited in their use of GPS to track suspected automobiles. However, because of a spit in reasoning, the question may not be fully solved. Article source: Supreme court limits GPS vehicle tacking, maybe

            Comment

            • #36
              Dahhh i guess i should click the link now.

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 3 template Next
              Working...
              X