Score one for the citizenry.

[stevo]

My security code is FTP. Wait, that's not enough digits...

FTP1?

Stevo

[stevo]

how many times do i drive the 190 and see cop pulling over a speeder when there are 20 illegal mexicans do landscaping? why dont they round them up instead of pulling over speeders? i

<-- raises hand

Oh oh, pick me pick me, I know the answer. Pick me!

Stevo

[forbes]

<-- raises hand

Oh oh, pick me pick me, I know the answer. Pick me!

Stevo

yes stevo... go ahead lol

[mikec]

FTP1?

Stevo

Naah, that's the code to the home alarm. Gotta keep it somewhat unique... lol

[stevo]

yes stevo... go ahead lol

I'll take "there is no money in it" for $1000, Alex.

Stevo

[forbes]

I'll take "there is no money in it" for $1000, Alex.

Stevo

and you have opened todays double jeopardy question.

[forbes]

Why don't you submit a FOI request for my citations written over the last 20 years and see how many of those I've issued......


Good luck with that.

your right.. good luck with that , cause you know as citizen, i would have to jump thru hoops... and as i have noticed.. you seem to be an ok cop... ur still a cop tho...
why dont you post all of your fellow officers citations for that and see what it looks like

[dcs13]

I'll take "there is no money in it" for $1000, Alex.

Stevo

You're kind of right. Obama is cutting the 287g funding. That's the money for the locals to enforce the immigration laws on those already arrested. The locals still can't just stop and ask for papers....

[slow06]

So you're gonna dodge the question?

Typical.


I don't know, check out the case and see if getting hundreds of thousands of drugs off the street is worth it.

Question dodging aside, don't you think he has a point?

For the sake of argument I'll go along and say (Insert LEO here) has a solid reason for using a GPS tracker on a suspect. Why then, would they not get a warrant first? If the reasoning is so strong it doesn't seem like it would be an issue. Is it just guys cutting corners?

For the record I have never been illegally searched or tracked (that I know of).

[03trubluGT]

your right.. good luck with that , cause you know as citizen, i would have to jump thru hoops... and as i have noticed.. you seem to be an ok cop... ur still a cop tho...
why dont you post all of your fellow officers citations for that and see what it looks like

Then call in Becky Oliver and have her do it.


Don't make me responsible for the actions of others. We are all responsible for ourselves.

[03trubluGT]

Question dodging aside, don't you think he has a point?

For the sake of argument I'll go along and say (Insert LEO here) has a solid reason for using a GPS tracker on a suspect. Why then, would they not get a warrant first? If the reasoning is so strong it doesn't seem like it would be an issue. Is it just guys cutting corners?

For the record I have never been illegally searched or tracked (that I know of).

Without going back, I think there was no set standard for getting a warrant for tracking, only searches involving phone, email, locations, etc. I think this case has now set the precedent.

[03trubluGT]

I'm not dogging the question, it's irrelevant. It doesn't matter how many times I have been tracked, it only matters that they were doing it warrantless.


Trampling peoples rights is not worth it. As Danny already pointed out in this thread, even criminals have rights, contrary to your beliefs.

No, it is perfectly relevent, you just don't want to answer the question.

And don't go putting words into my mouth. You don't have that right.

[talisman]

Matt, the lengths you go to to justify things seriously gives me a headache some times. I'd like to pretend that you're just trying to stir the pot, but after all these years of reading this type of stuff from you, I don't believe that at all.

[01vnms4v]

Guys, I just get tired of all the pissing and moaning on this topic, but not one person is active in trying to actually making a change.

Whine about this, whine about that is all I see. Fuck it gets old.

I second that!

And fixed

[racrguy]

No, it is perfectly relevent, you just don't want to answer the question.

Ok then, why don't you explain how it's relevant instead of continually asserting. I've explained how it's not, now it's your turn. Step outside of your SOP.

And don't go putting words into my mouth. You don't have that right.

I can say anything I please (within certain reasons). And I didn't put words in your mouth. You think average everyday citizens shouldn't worry about the government tracking them, so it stands to reason that you think the same about criminals. Or do you think criminals have more rights than the average citizen?