Washington named Britains all time greatest adversary

[Ratt]

I think Steve sells bipolar meds on the side. You should look him up.

Not sure what you mean by that, or wher eyou got the idea that I'm bi-polar.

[racrguy]

I enjoy reading your responses in this thread, but I would have to disagree with you on this one..



The US Constitution, by it's very nature is meant to limit Government by saying what powers it has and doesn't have. The third article of the 1st amendment specifically says that government cannot create a religion or stop others from practicing their religion.

This is why we don't have teacher led prayer in schools. It isn't that the Constitution prevents prayer, it is that the teacher is an agent of the government and thus cannot lead prayer because it represents a government endorsement of religious belief. That kind of action can even be an enforcement of religion since a teacher is an authority figure in a school..

If the Constitution were to actually put a limit on religion, then the feds would have the ability to tell us who or what we can or cannot worship. Even though I'm a Christian (and an admitted flawed one at that) I have no desire to have a Theocracy. I can just imagine how bad it could potentially be if Southern Baptists ran things. (feel free to scratch out Southern Baptists and replace it with any other religious sect)

A post worthy of a response!

It is also limiting religion, in that it cannot weasel its way into the government (how effective it's been we can obviously see in states like TN and AZ.) How do you think religion came into power in the dark ages? It got intertwined with the government and started creating laws that were religious in nature. By banning such laws from being passed, you are limiting religion. Contrary to some peoples belief, there are still instances to this day that people are fighting (and in some cases succeeding) to inject religion into the government.

I don't give two shits if a legislator is religious or not. I take issue when he/she tries to pass laws, morally judge me, or limit my freedoms with the basis of a holy book or the belief in a divine power.

[slow99]

You too you greasy fat fuck. Suck down another cheeseburger and cigarette and talk shit from behind a keyboard like you are something to be reckoned.

That made me laugh.

[Sgt Beavis]

Yet those same founding fathers, in the constitution, only mention religion in order to limit it. Look at you, talking out of your ass because you've got no clue what you're talking about. I imagine if knowledge was a baseball bat, Broncojohnny and crew would've missed you every time. Alas it seems they've merely beaten you more stupid than you already were.

I enjoy reading your responses in this thread, but I would have to disagree with you on this one..

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The US Constitution, by it's very nature is meant to limit Government by saying what powers it has and doesn't have. The third article of the 1st amendment specifically says that government cannot create a religion or stop others from practicing their religion.

This is why we don't have teacher led prayer in schools. It isn't that the Constitution prevents prayer, it is that the teacher is an agent of the government and thus cannot lead prayer because it represents a government endorsement of religious belief. That kind of action can even be an enforcement of religion since a teacher is an authority figure in a school..

If the Constitution were to actually put a limit on religion, then the feds would have the ability to tell us who or what we can or cannot worship. Even though I'm a Christian (and an admitted flawed one at that) I have no desire to have a Theocracy. I can just imagine how bad it could potentially be if Southern Baptists ran things. (feel free to scratch out Southern Baptists and replace it with any other religious sect)

[Denny]

I think the Brit's deserve some props for giving Washington his due.

I heard he just got lucky (and doesn't take Christmas off).

[Sgt Beavis]

I think the Brit's deserve some props for giving Washington his due.

[The King]

wrong kind of nail

Only if you take sarcasm seriously

[SS Junk]

Very Christian like.

That's what you chose to use? I figured you would've been more bent on the beating in the name of Jesus. I said I am Christian. Never said I was perfect therefore no need for some self-righteous pompous ass judging my actions.

I expect nothing less.

Hush up, bitch. When I want your girly opinion I'll slap it out of you.

wrong kind of nail

You too you greasy fat fuck. Suck down another cheeseburger and cigarette and talk shit from behind a keyboard like you are something to be reckoned.

Fuck you, you drunk bald bastard. Shouldn't you be banging some Hooters waitress right about now?

I think Steve sells bipolar meds on the side. You should look him up.

[Silverback]

Since it was more of a catfight, consider "claw" biter

wrong kind of nail

[The King]

No kidding, it was turning into a real "nail" biter.

Since it was more of a catfight, consider "claw" biter

[Vertnut]

This thread has gone to shit, Britain has won this round.

Truism! Our forefathers would shit their collective pants. LOL!

[Jesus Christ]

What happened here? Did it move to PMs? It was just getting good!

No kidding, it was turning into a real "nail" biter.

[Ratt]

What happened here? Did it move to PMs? It was just getting good!

[racrguy]

Very Christian like.

I expect nothing less.

[Craizie]

What a fag. Make sure to hold up a sign stating BITCH with a downward arrow. I will then take that sign and make you eat it, wait around for you to shit it out and make you eat it again. You are nothing but a weak mouthy bitch. When you get called on it you become a complete coward.
IF you aren't there I will find you. I have ways.

Very Christian like.