These iceholes have violated others fargen rights!

[Ratt]

I'll be fine with allowing gay marriage when they allow prayer & Christ back in schools aside evolution.

That's a stupid argument.

[Treasure Chest]

So freedom of choice is cool as long as freedom of religion is trampled upon? Or, did you mean Christianity AND all other religions should be brought into schools?

Did you mean to quote me?

[jluv]

Children are free to pray in school, if they like.

So freedom of choice is cool as long as freedom of religion is trampled upon? Or, did you mean Christianity AND all other religions should be brought into schools?

[YALE]

I'll be fine with allowing gay marriage when they allow prayer & Christ back in schools aside evolution.

Are you talking about mandating prayer in schools?

[Treasure Chest]

Children are free to pray in school, if they like.

[KWClutch]

I'll be fine with allowing gay marriage when they allow prayer & Christ back in schools aside evolution.

[sc281]

I couldn't give a shit less.

Like I said before.

The left wants to control you through legislating your pocketbook.

The right wants to control you through legislating your morality.


Fuck 'em all!

[YALE]

I really didn't want to post in this thread, but this article articulated my thoughts better than I could have.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/299394/north-carolina-biden-and-same-sex-marriage-ryan-t-anderson#

Saved and Texan by the Grace of God, Redneck by choice.

That's a petty, hypocritical article dude, and the fact that you couldn't elucidate that guy's points beyond agreeing with them points to them never having occurred to you in the first place, beyond you not liking gay marriage for your own personal and religious reasons.

[YALE]

Can a Justice of the Piece charge you with a Mr. Meaner?

Only if you get sent to Lewis Derrick first, so crotchless-chris can love you tenderly. He's the real Justice of the Piece.

[DaisyDoesDallas]

..

[Tx Redneck]

I really didn't want to post in this thread, but this article articulated my thoughts better than I could have.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/299394/north-carolina-biden-and-same-sex-marriage-ryan-t-anderson#

Saved and Texan by the Grace of God, Redneck by choice.

[Rick Modena]

Can a Justice of the Piece charge you with a Mr. Meaner?

[85whtgt]

This is exactly my point. If you don't want to marry a dude, don't. Plain and simple. The decision only affects the couple applying for a marriage license. It's not going to stop them from being a couple. It's not going to stop them from raising children. Their choices are never going to be accepted by the opposing side, so why go out of their way to limit their choices? The only thing they're preventing is addition on health plans, complicating emergency medical consent, and disallowing survivor's benefits.

I have more of an issue with surviving parents that use harvested sperm/eggs to have children after their spouses death and filing survivors benefits for those children than I have for a gay couple that want to get married and be eligible for their spouse's benefits.

I actually agree with you, but the fact remains that their state has the right to define marriage as they choose. If their residents don't approve it's up to them to contact their representatives or move to a state that better suits them. Once the state takes enough heat/ loses enough tax base, they'll change their tune.

[Treasure Chest]

Just because I don't believe in gay marriage, doesn't mean I can vote to make it illegal for others to do it. Why the hell did we start this country in the first place?

This is exactly my point. If you don't want to marry a dude, don't. Plain and simple. The decision only affects the couple applying for a marriage license. It's not going to stop them from being a couple. It's not going to stop them from raising children. Their choices are never going to be accepted by the opposing side, so why go out of their way to limit their choices? The only thing they're preventing is addition on health plans, complicating emergency medical consent, and disallowing survivor's benefits.

I have more of an issue with surviving parents that use harvested sperm/eggs to have children after their spouses death and filing survivors benefits for those children than I have for a gay couple that want to get married and be eligible for their spouse's benefits.

[Denny]

Just because I don't believe in gay marriage, doesn't mean I can vote to make it illegal for others to do it. Why the hell did we start this country in the first place?