Are you the Quagmire in your neighborhood?

[talisman]

Huh?

You and some others sound oddly dispassionate about someone dropping a load off in your lady's box. You may want to sit down and reevaluate your true feelings of said woman. Some things in this world should be sacrosanct.

You sure are always worried about other peoples personality disorders while doing absolutely nothing to correct your own. What is a person called who does that all the time again?

[Nash B.]

Where did see that anyone on here said that they would kill/rough up anyone that screwed their wife?

Isn't that what you implied with your post about him winding up dead or in the hospital if the other guy hadn't been a coward?

Huh?

You and some others sound oddly dispassionate about someone dropping a load off in your lady's box. You may want to sit down and reevaluate your true feelings of said woman. Some things in this world should be sacrosanct.

See, it's something to get pissed about, but who's more at fault - the woman that betrayed you, or the guy that facilitated her betrayal? IMO, the majority is on the woman, and there's not enough of a reason to be mad at the guy for bringing out the cheating whore in a woman (and saving you from having to find out it's in there many months or years down the road) to actually do anything to him.

[BttleFedC10]

Still no pics of said married woman?? lol

[davbrucas]

Isn't that what you implied with your post about him winding up dead or in the hospital if the other guy hadn't been a coward?

No. I would have said it instead of "implying" it...

[LS1Goat]

You sure are always worried about other peoples personality disorders while doing absolutely nothing to correct your own. What is a person called who does that all the time again?

talisman??

Isn't that what you implied with your post about him winding up dead or in the hospital if the other guy hadn't been a coward?

Implied? I think you're reading too much into what other people are saying.

See, it's something to get pissed about, but who's more at fault - the woman that betrayed you, or the guy that facilitated her betrayal? IMO, the majority is on the woman, and there's not enough of a reason to be mad at the guy for bringing out the cheating whore in a woman (and saving you from having to find out it's in there many months or years down the road) to actually do anything to him.

Betrayal is a two party system. I'm sorry, but I can't subscribe to your dogma of the wife being the only culpable party in this scenario. The guy fucked another man's wife and cried about getting his house vandalized as a result. To me that makes about as much sense as the term "non-criminal" illegal immigrant.

[trblshooter]

Still no pics of said married woman?? lol

I'm not home yet damn it...I'll put one up here in a bit. Then you'll all be like "oh now I understand".

[Nash B.]

No. I would have said it instead of "implying" it...

Implied? I think you're reading too much into what other people are saying.

Okay, then please, explain what this means

You're lucky that this guy was a coward. Otherwise, you would have been either in the hospital or dead...regardless of fault.

and how it does or does not answer the question

Are guys really dumb enough to beat someone up or kill someone because their wife cheated?

Betrayal is a two party system. I'm sorry, but I can't subscribe to your dogma of the wife being the only culpable party in this scenario. The guy fucked another man's wife and cried about getting his house vandalized as a result. To me that makes about as much sense as the term "non-criminal" illegal immigrant.

No, betrayal isn't a two party system. There are many ways a single person/entity can betray someone. And if you'll read again, I didn't say the wife is the only one at fault, but she's much more at fault than the guy that didn't know (or barely knew) her husband. It would be different if they were friends, but in my opinion, he hardly deserves to get shot or have his ass kicked for it, and probably doesn't deserve to have his shit destroyed (and it wouldn't be a smart move on the husband's part to do any of this, either).

[davbrucas]

Do I really need to explain myself other than saying that I was not implying what you read into the comment?

[Nash B.]

Do I really need to explain myself other than saying that I was not implying what you read into the comment?

Yeah, because the only thing I can get from your post was that if the guy hadn't been a coward, he would've beaten the shit out of, or killed, the OP, regardless of fault (which means that yes, guys are dumb enough to beat up or kill someone because their wife was cheating). But you said no?

[LS1Goat]

Okay, then please, explain what this meansand how it does or does not answer the questionNo, betrayal isn't a two party system. There are many ways a single person/entity can betray someone. And if you'll read again, I didn't say the wife is the only one at fault, but she's much more at fault than the guy that didn't know (or barely knew) her husband. It would be different if they were friends, but in my opinion, he hardly deserves to get shot or have his ass kicked for it, and probably doesn't deserve to have his shit destroyed (and it wouldn't be a smart move on the husband's part to do any of this, either).

I can't answer for top portion. I didn't say it. Again, I think you're reading implications into the answer.

As for part I highlighted in bold; I don't see anywhere where anyone made those statements. Secondly, the part of how he didn't really deserve the vandalism to his house is total bunk. You're saying that just because he was an opportunist (like many guys like that are) and she was complicit, his actions deserve some form of impunity because he was just taking advantage of a whore? This so-called whore was another man's wife. I guess this fundamental point is rocket science to sum. Just because you're strolling through the store and you see someone's credit card lying on the ground with no one around to see it, it doesn't give you license to pick it up use it. Unless, you are opportunistic and just want to take something because you can.

I just don't follow your logic.

[trblshooter]

Let me squash all of this by saying yes I was wrong and was expecting some sort of retaliation. The deeper this story goes about this guy the less I feel bad about it. Somewhere in this thread someone mentioned the possibility of him being a cheater as well; this is true. But my own personal feelings aside, I'm a single man and she was not. I was used as a scapegoat in this particular situation and I really don't expect to recover any material loss as I'm still on the fence about the civil suit.

[davbrucas]

Yeah, because the only thing I can get from your post was that if the guy hadn't been a coward, he would've beaten the shit out of, or killed, the OP, regardless of fault (which means that yes, guys are dumb enough to beat up or kill someone because their wife was cheating). But you said no?

I meant that the guy was a coward for tearing up his shit...some people do not have the ability to think rationally when emotions are involved. I agree with you guys in that the OP did the husband a favor.

[red95gts]

Seems to me that the wife should let you fuck her in the ass one last time. Consider it a "I'm sorry that my soon-to-be ex-husband fucked up all your shit."

[onemeangixxer7502]

I don't see why he's not more pissed at her, really it's not worth the trouble of roughing up or tearing up some ones stuff. Work through it or move on if she cheats

[jw33]

7.5 months on USS Kearsarge

When?