Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Potheads enter please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BlackSnake
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    Always cite your sources. Has the appearance of plagiarism otherwise.
    Yeah. I prolly should have. Its good reading though.

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by mikec View Post
    Phenotype was a word that was new to him, so, no way you knew it if he didn't.

    My guess at least...

    I know what phenotypes are.

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
    True. Not sure what your point is though.


    Always cite your sources. Has the appearance of plagiarism otherwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • mikec
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
    True. Not sure what your point is though.
    Phenotype was a word that was new to him, so, no way you knew it if he didn't.

    My guess at least...

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackSnake
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    There is no way in hell you correctly used the word phenotypes. Most obvious cut and paste ever.
    True. Not sure what your point is though.

    Leave a comment:


  • majorownage
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    There is no way in hell you correctly used the word phenotypes. Most obvious cut and paste ever.
    I am getting back to token after at least a 20 year hiatus. So what's the deal with prices these days? Has pot over the last 20 or so years become...

    Leave a comment:


  • mikec
    replied
    Truth in post 48. Never even heard of a phenotype before...

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
    The (15-20% THC) strains has been in existance since before me. "Regular" weed is probably more potent on average, but the premo weed potency hasn't changed though.

    There were South East Asian strains reported by DEA testing in the early to mid 70's that were 20%+, as well as several Hawiian strains that were reproted to be in the mid to high 20% level. Real Santa Marta Columbian reds and golds were in the 12-15% range. So when it comes to potency, it is not higher than many strains available in the 70's and 80's, only thing that has changed is there are more of them. The late 80's to late 90's bought on a breeding revolution which created 100's of strains which ranged from the 10% to high 20% range. We must also remember that many of the strains that were available from the late 60's to early 80's were used to create many of the strains of today. In many cases, some strains are not new, only the phenotypes are new.


    There is no way in hell you correctly used the word phenotypes. Most obvious cut and paste ever.

    Leave a comment:


  • majorownage
    replied
    Sup gauiz!

    15 bluntz are possible if you are damnitsteve and the only shit you smoke is mexi shwag.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackSnake
    replied
    Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy View Post
    haha alright dude...weed is just like any other technologically advanced thing...everything is bigger and better today

    guys crossbreed the best bud to come up with some frankenstein shit...shit youve never had
    The (15-20% THC) strains has been in existance since before me. "Regular" weed is probably more potent on average, but the premo weed potency hasn't changed though.

    There were South East Asian strains reported by DEA testing in the early to mid 70's that were 20%+, as well as several Hawiian strains that were reproted to be in the mid to high 20% level. Real Santa Marta Columbian reds and golds were in the 12-15% range. So when it comes to potency, it is not higher than many strains available in the 70's and 80's, only thing that has changed is there are more of them. The late 80's to late 90's bought on a breeding revolution which created 100's of strains which ranged from the 10% to high 20% range. We must also remember that many of the strains that were available from the late 60's to early 80's were used to create many of the strains of today. In many cases, some strains are not new, only the phenotypes are new.

    Leave a comment:


  • 91CoupeMike
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
    Lol, no. But I have dropped some of that too.
    Fuck that. Lol I won't ever "drop" anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackSnake
    replied
    Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
    Purple haze!
    Lol, no. But I have dropped some of that too.

    Leave a comment:


  • dsrtuckteezy
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
    There is a big difference in weed and weed laced with coke. Trust me, I can tell the difference. And your hippies just didnt get good weed. Big problem back then. There was so much weed going around those days that most of it was just good at best. I promise you, the weed we smoked most of the time was 2 to 3 hit. It was all you wanted. Was stupid to try smoking more.

    I know whats all been done to improve todays weed, and I grant you that its much better than most that floated around in the 60's and 70's. Hell, if you was lucky enough to get a "good" connection out of Hawaii we would get 1 hit once in a while. I forget what we use to call it, but it had purple hairs all over it.
    haha alright dude...weed is just like any other technologically advanced thing...everything is bigger and better today

    guys crossbreed the best bud to come up with some frankenstein shit...shit youve never had

    Leave a comment:


  • 91CoupeMike
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
    There is a big difference in weed and weed laced with coke. Trust me, I can tell the difference. And your hippies just didnt get good weed. Big problem back then. There was so much weed going around those days that most of it was just good at best. I promise you, the weed we smoked most of the time was 2 to 3 hit. It was all you wanted. Was stupid to try smoking more.

    I know whats all been done to improve todays weed, and I grant you that its much better than most that floated around in the 60's and 70's. Hell, if you was lucky enough to get a "good" connection out of Hawaii we would get 1 hit once in a while. I forget what we use to call it, but it had purple hairs all over it.
    Purple haze!

    Leave a comment:


  • fordracer2
    replied
    I quit smoking when i started driving truck but we used to pass 3 or 4 blunts around back in the day. 15 is just stupid and a waste if that is true. He should stop smoking for a couple weeks and then see how much higher he gets. personally i think he is blowing smoke up your ass.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X