Originally posted by Broncojohnny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Beware your first 2013 paycheck
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View PostThose of you saying much more than 100/check are either making way over 250K, get paid monthly, or aren't lookin at increases in other things. The 2% increase caps at 113,700 which means a person paid biweekly would see no more than an $87.46 hit per check.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View PostThose of you saying much more than 100/check are either making way over 250K, get paid monthly, or aren't lookin at increases in other things. The 2% increase caps at 113,700 which means a person paid biweekly would see no more than an $87.46 hit per check.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Buzzo View Postwhat about my 800 I was short?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View PostThose of you saying much more than 100/check are either making way over 250K, get paid monthly, or aren't lookin at increases in other things. The 2% increase caps at 113,700 which means a person paid biweekly would see no more than an $87.46 hit per check.
Leave a comment:
-
Those of you saying much more than 100/check are either making way over 250K, get paid monthly, or aren't lookin at increases in other things. The 2% increase caps at 113,700 which means a person paid biweekly would see no more than an $87.46 hit per check.
Leave a comment:
-
I hope all the welfare babies are happy, this is bullshit. Just powered some low life's Ophone and put money in thier pocket to buy drugs that should not be legal and guns that I soon will not be able to afford or purchase legally as a law abiding citizen.
Leave a comment:
-
What the mother fuck my check is little over 100$ less than its supposed to be.
Leave a comment:
-
Looks like my check was $32 short this time. While it's not that big of a difference it still sucks!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mikec View PostThis article has all kinds of neat charts showing the impact.
"Workers making $30,000 will take a bigger hit on their pay than those earning $500,000 under new fiscal deal"
Middle-class workers will take a bigger hit to their income proportionately than those earning between $200,000 and $500,000 under the new fiscal cliff deal, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.
Earners in the latter group will pay an average 1.3 percent more - or an additional $2,711 - in taxes this year, while workers making between $30,000 and $200,000 will see their paychecks shrink by as much as 1.7 percent - or up to $1,784 - the D.C.-based think tank reported.
Overall, nearly 80 percent of households will pay more money to the federal government as a result of the fiscal cliff deal.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...scal-deal.html
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chopped54 View PostIf you are making $250k a year it should effect your paycheck by about $415 a month.
Now for DFWMs its going to be about $1660 a month for a majority of its members....
Damn, how much is your house payment, $400????
I DO know that $400 a month is a pretty decent car payment, and my accounts will notice the difference.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mikec View PostThis article has all kinds of neat charts showing the impact.
"Workers making $30,000 will take a bigger hit on their pay than those earning $500,000 under new fiscal deal"
Middle-class workers will take a bigger hit to their income proportionately than those earning between $200,000 and $500,000 under the new fiscal cliff deal, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.
Earners in the latter group will pay an average 1.3 percent more - or an additional $2,711 - in taxes this year, while workers making between $30,000 and $200,000 will see their paychecks shrink by as much as 1.7 percent - or up to $1,784 - the D.C.-based think tank reported.
Overall, nearly 80 percent of households will pay more money to the federal government as a result of the fiscal cliff deal.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...scal-deal.html
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: