Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Beware your first 2013 paycheck

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The King
    replied
    You go, google girl.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by The King View Post
    $17,000 or $22,500 divided by the number of pay periods you had in 2012 then. Makes absolutely no difference, the maximum still applies.
    Do I have to explain this to you?

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Lol, retard

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    *facepalm* Forget I mentioned it.

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    I was talking per pay period, not total.
    $17,000 or $22,500 divided by the number of pay periods you had in 2012 then. Makes absolutely no difference, the maximum still applies.

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by The King View Post
    The maximum 401K contribution you could make last year was $17,000, or $22,500 if you were over 50. So, would 100% of your wages have been $17,000 or $22,500? Either you're not paid shit, or your financial education is totally absent.

    I was talking per pay period, not total.

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    Max allowed is 100%. I've got a house and car to pay for sucka!


    You guys are retarded. When they REDUCED our taxes by 2%, I INCREASED my contribution by the 2% so I wouldn't even notice it. Jesus Christ.
    The maximum 401K contribution you could make last year was $17,000, or $22,500 if you were over 50. So, would 100% of your wages have been $17,000 or $22,500? Either you're not paid shit, or your financial education is totally absent.

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by The King View Post
    Sucks to be you if you were not already contributing the maximum allowed to your 401K when the 2% reduction first began.


    Max allowed is 100%. I've got a house and car to pay for sucka!


    You guys are retarded. When they REDUCED our taxes by 2%, I INCREASED my contribution by the 2% so I wouldn't even notice it. Jesus Christ.

    Leave a comment:


  • Binky
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    Am I the only one here that simply upped my 401k contribution by 2% when they first made this cut? Sucks to be y'all.
    FICA is based off gross pay BEFORE 401k is taken out so you're paying the 6% whether you like it or not. Boosting your 401k another 2% isn't changing anything except further reducing your takehome.

    Maybe its just sunday and I'm missing what the benefit is.

    Leave a comment:


  • snacksnack
    replied
    So let me get this straight. If you make a nice round number of 1000 dollars a week and they are taking an extra 2% from that paycheck that would be 20 bucks. Now I contribute 2% more to 401k that would bring my gross down to 980. Now the extra 2% on the 980 is 19.60 a week they take right? so this is like saying I made an extra .40 cents per 1000 and 20.80 per year saved from going to the man? Is this really what you are bragging about fucking the man out of by contributing to your 401k?

    Leave a comment:


  • slow99
    replied
    chooooo$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ choooooooo$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    Am I the only one here that simply upped my 401k contribution by 2% when they first made this cut? Sucks to be y'all.
    Sucks to be you if you were not already contributing the maximum allowed to your 401K when the 2% reduction first began.

    Leave a comment:


  • Samhain
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    Am I the only one here that simply upped my 401k contribution by 2% when they first made this cut? Sucks to be y'all.
    I didn't think to do it but our company CPA recommended it. Thanks Pattymelt!

    Edit - God dammit I just saw the tags!

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Jedi View Post
    Who are you?


    Dan Bishop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Binky
    replied
    Originally posted by Stanger View Post

    That wouldn't be you, would it?
    Who are you?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X