Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Union Arson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Union Arson

    Union Workers *Probably* Torched a Quaker Meetinghouse Over Christmas

    John K. Ross|Jan. 6, 2013 12:30 pm

    Police say union workers "almost certainly" torched an under-construction Quaker meetinghouse in northwest Philadelphia four days before Christmas. The Chestnut Hill Friends had hired non-union labor for the project, which discommoded several construction unions.

    From the Philadelphia Inquirer:

    Vandals with an acetylene torch crept onto the project's muddy construction site in the middle of the night. Working out of view in the meetinghouse's freshly cemented basement, they sliced off dozens of bolts securing the bare steel columns and set fire to the building crane, causing $500,000 in damage.

    Police detectives deemed the attack arson because of a series of confrontational visits from union officials days before the incident. They say the torch could only have been operated by a trained professional, and believe it was almost certainly the work of disgruntled union members. The city has assigned extra investigators to the case and is working with federal forensic experts to track down the vandals, said Michael Resnick, the city's public safety commissioner.

    …Trade unions dictate hiring at virtually all large construction projects in the city. Their dominance has had the virtue of ensuring that members receive good salaries and generous benefits, on par with those in New York. But it has also made construction exceptionally expensive here. Those high costs, real estate experts like Kevin C. Gillen at Econsult argue, have been a drag on the city's revival.

    …Cross [the unions] by hiring nonunion workers or demanding more efficient work rules, and you can expect a giant inflatable rat at your door—or worse. The Post brothers, who are renovating a former factory into apartments at 12th and Wood Streets, learned the hard way in the spring when union protesters laid siege to their construction site, blocking deliveries for five months.

    ...It was not an easy decision, acknowledged Meg Mitchell, clerk of the meeting, the closest thing the non-hierarchial group has to a spokesperson. But after assuring themselves that [the contractor] was paying fair wages and that his company had maintained an excellent safety record, she said, the Chestnut Hill Friends dropped any lingering reservations.

    Philadelphia Magazine has in-depth coverage (“brutish threats, expletive-heavy protests”) of the Post Brothers' dust-up with Philadelphia’s Building and Construction Trades Council.

    Reason hosted a dust-up of our own over right-to-work laws last month.

    Police say union workers "almost certainly" torched an under-construction Quaker meetinghouse in northwest Philadelphia four days before Christmas. The Chestnut…
    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

  • #2
    Unions are not much different than organized crime, when it comes to their tactics. Go to Vegas or Manhattan and try to compete for projects, as an open shop...if you're lucky, they'll start with torching your projects and office...if you're not so lucky or you're considered to be a legitimate threat, it will be much worse...

    Comment


    • #3
      Except for the fact the courts have ruled that unions can commit crimes and not be punished
      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

      Comment


      • #4
        Fuuuuck..... They burned a church?
        ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
          Except for the fact the courts have ruled that unions can commit crimes and not be punished
          I'm not familiar with that, but I know that those union members don't act on their own, in these situations. These things are encouraged from the highest levels of the union organizations. I have a friend that I've known since we were toddlers, and once he got in a local electrical union, he completely changed; he's brainwashed by the union propaganda and literally gets violently angry about "rat shops", as they call them, or anything that remotely challenges the propaganda that's been drilled into his head. I know several former union members, and I've heard the same stories over and over...crazy stuff.

          Comment


          • #6
            United States v. Enmons
            Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
            Supreme Court of the United States
            Argued December 4, 1972
            Decided February 22, 1973
            Full case name United States v. Enmons
            Citations 410 U.S. 396 (more)
            Court membership
            Chief Justice
            Warren E. Burger
            Associate Justices
            William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan, Jr.
            Potter Stewart · Byron White
            Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
            Lewis F. Powell, Jr. · William Rehnquist
            Case opinions
            Majority Stewart, joined by Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun
            Concurrence Blackmun
            Dissent Douglas, joined by Burger, Powell, Rehnquist

            United States v. Enmons, 410 U.S. 396 (1973), was a controversial United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that violence, if carried out in furtherance of a labor union's objectives, does not violate the law according to the extortion and robbery provisions of the federal anti-Racketeering Act of 1934 or the Hobbs Act.
            I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

            Comment

            Working...
            X