Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Camaro outsells Mustang
Collapse
X
-
Can't speak from personal experience about the crapmaro but I love the 2011 Mustang and I was a GM guy. GM had every chace to make that thing really sell but they phailed miserably yet once again, looks like shit.
Leave a comment:
-
x2Originally posted by poopnut2 View PostProbably because the 5.0/3.7 engines were announced for 2011 and nobody wanted to "waste" money on a new mustang until the new engines were available. I have a feeling mustang sales will put camaro sales to shame next year.
Leave a comment:
-
Was this for a calendar year or the 2010 Model year for each car?
Leave a comment:
-
Can't you get into a V8 2011 Mustang for about $8k less than a Camaro SS? Even the used V8 Camaros are still over $30k just about everywhere I've seen one. Obviously the Mustang is going to outsell it in the long run.
Leave a comment:
-
Damn. Three boat lengths?Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post4.0 in 05-09 was 200hp. Lol don't give that ranger engine any more credit then it deserves.
Friend raced a 3.8 v6 in a 5.3 suburban. Burb got it by 2 burban lengths.
EDIT: 2005-2010 was rated at 210hp.Last edited by jdgregory84; 01-12-2011, 12:58 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
4.0 in 05-09 was 200hp. Lol don't give that ranger engine any more credit then it deserves.Originally posted by poopnut2 View PostDid you black out after the /? I said 5.0/3.7.
Ummmm...215(225?)hp 4.0 V6 rated at 25mpg or 3.7 liter with over 300hp rated at 31mpg?
Friend raced a 3.8 v6 in a 5.3 suburban. Burb got it by 2 burban lengths.
Leave a comment:
-
His problem was memory after reading the statement. I mentioned the V6.Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostThe 2010 v6 mustang was a pile of shit like the v8.
So his point still stands.
Leave a comment:
-
Did you black out after the /? I said 5.0/3.7.Originally posted by Denny View PostDo you really think the V8 sales make up the majority of those numbers?
Ummmm...215(225?)hp 4.0 V6 rated at 25mpg or 3.7 liter with over 300hp rated at 31mpg?
Leave a comment:
-
The 2010 v6 mustang was a pile of shit like the v8.Originally posted by Denny View PostDo you really think the V8 sales make up the majority of those numbers?
So his point still stands.
Leave a comment:
-
:golf clap:Originally posted by poopnut2 View PostProbably because the 5.0/3.7 engines were announced for 2011 and nobody wanted to "waste" money on a new mustang until the new engines were available. I have a feeling mustang sales will put camaro sales to shame next year.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: