Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Camaro outsells Mustang

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sig239
    replied
    Good maybe they can pay back the rest of the money we paid to bail them out..

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Man
    replied
    Can't speak from personal experience about the crapmaro but I love the 2011 Mustang and I was a GM guy. GM had every chace to make that thing really sell but they phailed miserably yet once again, looks like shit.

    Leave a comment:


  • SVT Lurch
    replied
    I blame BumbleBee. Either way I'm glad the competition is back.

    Leave a comment:


  • bpawl
    replied
    Originally posted by poopnut2 View Post
    Did you black out after the /? I said 5.0/3.7.
    lmao

    Leave a comment:


  • Jewrrick
    replied
    Nice to see and American brand finally beat Toyota

    Leave a comment:


  • projectPONY
    replied
    Originally posted by poopnut2 View Post
    Probably because the 5.0/3.7 engines were announced for 2011 and nobody wanted to "waste" money on a new mustang until the new engines were available. I have a feeling mustang sales will put camaro sales to shame next year.
    x2

    Leave a comment:


  • mustangguy289
    replied
    Was this for a calendar year or the 2010 Model year for each car?

    Leave a comment:


  • BP
    replied
    Can't you get into a V8 2011 Mustang for about $8k less than a Camaro SS? Even the used V8 Camaros are still over $30k just about everywhere I've seen one. Obviously the Mustang is going to outsell it in the long run.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    The results will be different this year.

    Leave a comment:


  • jdgregory84
    replied
    Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
    4.0 in 05-09 was 200hp. Lol don't give that ranger engine any more credit then it deserves.

    Friend raced a 3.8 v6 in a 5.3 suburban. Burb got it by 2 burban lengths.
    Damn. Three boat lengths?

    EDIT: 2005-2010 was rated at 210hp.
    Last edited by jdgregory84; 01-12-2011, 12:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • 91CoupeMike
    replied
    Originally posted by poopnut2 View Post
    Did you black out after the /? I said 5.0/3.7.

    Ummmm...215(225?)hp 4.0 V6 rated at 25mpg or 3.7 liter with over 300hp rated at 31mpg?
    4.0 in 05-09 was 200hp. Lol don't give that ranger engine any more credit then it deserves.

    Friend raced a 3.8 v6 in a 5.3 suburban. Burb got it by 2 burban lengths.

    Leave a comment:


  • jdgregory84
    replied
    Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
    The 2010 v6 mustang was a pile of shit like the v8.

    So his point still stands.
    His problem was memory after reading the statement. I mentioned the V6.

    Leave a comment:


  • jdgregory84
    replied
    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    Do you really think the V8 sales make up the majority of those numbers?
    Did you black out after the /? I said 5.0/3.7.

    Ummmm...215(225?)hp 4.0 V6 rated at 25mpg or 3.7 liter with over 300hp rated at 31mpg?

    Leave a comment:


  • 91CoupeMike
    replied
    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    Do you really think the V8 sales make up the majority of those numbers?
    The 2010 v6 mustang was a pile of shit like the v8.

    So his point still stands.

    Leave a comment:


  • appelingogt
    replied
    Originally posted by poopnut2 View Post
    Probably because the 5.0/3.7 engines were announced for 2011 and nobody wanted to "waste" money on a new mustang until the new engines were available. I have a feeling mustang sales will put camaro sales to shame next year.
    :golf clap:

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X