Woman told no cops to help her due to budget cuts

[Forever_frost]

What part of policing isn't a Monday through Friday gig do YOU not get? Criminals don't take the day off on weekends after 5. If there was a single cop on duty that was not handling something that equals that offense, then he should be fired and blacklisted from the profession with someone else who can prioritize in his place.

I'm guessing they had all 6 cops in on this raid?

[03trubluGT]

Nope, not omitting facts. We are told that there are such limited funds that police cannot respond to a felony in progress. What they CAN respond to, in force, is to a misdemeanor that is legal under state law

Jesus Christo!

What part of Mon-Fri do you not get???

[Forever_frost]

Nope, not omitting facts. We are told that there are such limited funds that police cannot respond to a felony in progress. What they CAN respond to, in force, is to a misdemeanor that is legal under state law

[03trubluGT]

Looks like there were plenty of cops to raid a medical pot place:

http://nationalcannabiscoalition.com...topping-rapes/

Well, you keep intentionally omitting pertinent facts.

The drug raid was on a Thursday, and the article above says that the department is open Mon-Fri. The attack happened on a weekend when here was no service.

[Forever_frost]

Looks like there were plenty of cops to raid a medical pot place:

http://nationalcannabiscoalition.com/2013/05/oregon-medical-marijuana-raids-a-bigger-priority-than-stopping-rapes/

[diablo rojo]

...

[Forever_frost]

Are you going to sue them for trying and not accomplishing how you wanted it done.

Hell, I saw a couple of Texas Rangers hit long fly balls that should have been home runs. BRB, gotta call my attorney and sue them!

How I want it done? Of course not. Failure to do it at all? I'd love to have that option. Then again, I'd love to see cops held to the same rules as citizens AND to see any time a cop 'loses' dashcam footage during an investigation, them being charged with destruction of evidence and punished. Especially when they claim someone 'tripped.'


You're involved in a shootout and cops take 90 minutes to respond? Should be a suit against the dispatch. Someone kicking down your door threatening to kill you and no one shows up? Lawsuit. IF there was someone on duty who did not respond to you, if there was not something as serious going on (pretty sure someone trying to kill someone tops the list) and you don't respond, you should be held responsible.

Like those neat squads and computer systems that are taxpayer funded? Use them to do what it says on the bloody cars.



As far as it goes with Jamison (I really need to learn to multiquote), it's not drivel. It's law. How would you like it if a surgeon fucked you up and you couldn't sue him for his fuckup? You'd probably be pretty pissed. Especially if they could decide at random to invade your privacy, force you into an encounter and ruin your life at will.

Yes, let's talk about the sexual assault case. Do you see me coming up with excuses? No. You see me calling for swift and severe punishment and dishonorable discharge. Cops however never call for other cops to lose their badge and go to jail.

[03trubluGT]

You're not providing legal responsibility. If you fail to protect me, what repercussions do you face? Am I permitted to sue you for failure to save me? If you tell me you are on the way to my home being burglarized and you do not show up, can I sue you personally? Tell me. What legal responsibility and what punishment for failure to perform your 'serve and protect' function?

Are you going to sue them for trying and not accomplishing how you wanted it done.

Hell, I saw a couple of Texas Rangers hit long fly balls that should have been home runs. BRB, gotta call my attorney and sue them!

[JamisonFRC]

Beat a dead horse much? I've already addressed your drivel on the matter in one of your repetitive FTP threads. You already know the answer to that you dolt. You cited the court ruling in multiple threads.

Now, can you get back to talking about things you know nothing about? Or maybe touch on the rampant sexual assaults in the military. I'm sure they are isolated incidents. But it is blasted all over the news like a FTP article would be.

[Forever_frost]

If you don't have the manpower, you don't have the manpower. And please side step the fact that you ramble about things you know nothing about. If an on-duty officer flat out refuses to respond to a call he would get reprimanded, at minimum, most likely fired for dereliction of duty. Once again, this is based on my department.

You're not providing legal responsibility. If you fail to protect me, what repercussions do you face? Am I permitted to sue you for failure to save me? If you tell me you are on the way to my home being burglarized and you do not show up, can I sue you personally? Tell me. What legal responsibility and what punishment for failure to perform your 'serve and protect' function?

[Couver]

more tearjerker sob stories designed to press tax increases. I bet they still had their local "multicultural activity center" and their pre-school breakfast and after school lunch and midnight basketball...

I wonder what the response time would be if he were breaking into the police evidence locker? The one that has the guns confiscated from people who otherwise wouldn't have committed a crime, or the dope that people grew in their basement for their own use?

No midnight basketball and for fucking sure no multicultural activity center. That place is a Mecca for meth heads and hippie wannabes. The only people who turn out to vote are property owners who are saving their own dime taxwise because they are tired of paying for bullshit social programs. The douchebags from California who moved in there are the ones trying to make it like the place they left, only cheaper. Those fucktards don't realize that the reason Cali is so expensive is because of those programs.

THEY don't pay for them...


**edit as for dope and guns both are welcome or used to be. It has gone the other way now dope is more welcome then guns.

[JamisonFRC]

Ah but that's the problem. They didn't respond to calls for service. Thus, the problem.

You can roll your eyes all you like but I'm 100% right. Unless of course, you'd like to do what I keep asking for and prove me wrong.

If you don't have the manpower, you don't have the manpower. And please side step the fact that you ramble about things you know nothing about. If an on-duty officer flat out refuses to respond to a call he would get reprimanded, at minimum, most likely fired for dereliction of duty. Once again, this is based on my department.

[Forever_frost]

You prioritize. If what you're doing doesn't equal what's going on, you drop that and take off. If they need more police, cut a council position and use that money or figure it out. If there was a cop who was doing something that wasn't at the level of a guy kicking in a woman's door to rape her, he needs replaced.

[jewozzy]

Ah but that's the problem. They didn't respond to calls for service. Thus, the problem.

how can you respond to a call for service if you are already on one? the simple fact is they need/needed more police and dont have it...

[Forever_frost]

I'm sure you are trying to entice 03trublu into twisting off, but you are truly showing your ignorance on the subject. Even if an officer wanted to sit in his car as you say, he still gets calls for service. He responds to the call, no matter what it is. I know, I know, he has no duty to protect and serve

Ah but that's the problem. They didn't respond to calls for service. Thus, the problem.

You can roll your eyes all you like but I'm 100% right. Unless of course, you'd like to do what I keep asking for and prove me wrong.