Boulder woman disturbed to discover police regularly enter unsecured homes

[hustleman]

I grew up in a crack house: impress me.

Well the beat I work is about 4-5 sq miles of drug invested, gang-banger wannabes that love to rob, steal, and kill each other.

[hustleman]

If you see my door open, please make sure 03trublugt hasn't forced entry and molested my sweet sweet butthole.

LOL. Be sure to pull out all your illegal contraband and put it in plain view so I can pin a whole lot of cases on you. You know that's all we police try to do... put good/decent people in jail.

[Baron Von Crowder]

Sounds good. It can open your eyes a little bit about what this world is really about.

I grew up in a crack house: impress me.

[hustleman]

May have to do a ride along sometime.

Sounds good. It can open your eyes a little bit about what this world is really about.

Currently work in the north district. Actually Talisman's home resides in the sector I work.

If you see my door open, please make sure 03trublugt hasn't forced entry and molested my sweet sweet butthole.

[Baron Von Crowder]

Currently work in the north district. Actually Talisman's home resides in the sector I work.

May have to do a ride along sometime.

[hustleman]

south?

Currently work in the north district. Actually Talisman's home resides in the sector I work.

[Swamp Donkey]

Did the door face west? Maybe he just wanted to see if it was getting hot upstairs!?!?

[Forever_frost]

I totally understand that but when the final decision is the court system, then it has to be recognized. I know... Truly know that you are a man that can go through the course of life without government involvement. I absolutely respect that and appreciate that. The sad thing is so many others do not match your self-reliability and ask for the govt (police) to intervene in their life. My statements are not there to say you are wrong just a different perspective of why it is considered "lawful"

But that's the point. The final decision isn't the courts. It lies with the people. The people are capable of nullifying any law in court by jury nullification. What cops do not want to hear is that they need to be held to the higher standard because of the authority they wield and since you do not have cops telling on each other to weed out the bad ones, they are all polluted with the bad ones. The belief that there is any reason outside of you witnessing a burglary or hear screams, that you can enter someone's home without warrant is one of many problems. You wouldn't want me walking through your home because you either didn't close your door, or you didn't close it well.

If you come home and I'm walking through it, are you going to be okay with the explanation of "Your door was open so I thought I'd check things out?"

[03trubluGT]

Oh here we go with everyone being angry. Such a tired bit. Get new material.

You are acting like a bitch. Either you are angry, or on your period.

Which one is it?

[Broncojohnny]

Did I say it was directly related?

I'm just adding info.

No need to get so angry there, Alan.....

Oh here we go with everyone being angry. Such a tired bit. Get new material.

[Baron Von Crowder]

Arlington

south?

[03trubluGT]

And that means what in this argument about an "imminent" crime taking place?

Oh yea, it means jack shit. Shut the fuck up, clown. No one cares what you think.

Did I say it was directly related?

I'm just adding info.

No need to get so angry there, Alan.....

[Broncojohnny]

Apparently u have a very tough time reading. Please defer to my previous post about articulation of facts to imply exigent. Also how exigent is perspective. Man you are so hard headed its ridiculous. As stated previously the cited case is the precedent and different circumstance fall under the umbrella of exigent. Seriously just open your mind to understand what I'm speaking of. I'm not trying to change your mind of your anti-police. Just explaining the reasoning

I love this. Being pro-facts mean I am anti-police. If I disagree with your "cop logic" then I am anti-police. Is that what they teach you at the police academy? Anyone who doesn't accept your narrow minded assertions must be the enemy?

Exigent circumstances in the case you cited related to the police seeing a crime in progress and taking action. That standard is just a bit higher than seeing an open window don't you think? An open window is not the same as seeing a crime in progress. If it were the same then you would jump through every open window you see, as would I, to prevent a crime.

If you would like to make the case that it only makes sense to "investigate" if you see an open window then make it. That still doesn't mean there is some exigent circumstance that gives you the right to enter private homes. That is absurdity and I'll call bullshit on it all day long.

[hustleman]

No, it's not. The recourse is citizens refusing to recognize your authority to violate the constitutional rights of themselves and others. If citizens stood up to governmental agents for natural born rights we wouldn't have had internment or mass genocide. Laws are often created and upheld by government to give themselves more and more power yet you wouldn't stand for a citizen engaging in that same action over you.

I totally understand that but when the final decision is the court system, then it has to be recognized. I know... Truly know that you are a man that can go through the course of life without government involvement. I absolutely respect that and appreciate that. The sad thing is so many others do not match your self-reliability and ask for the govt (police) to intervene in their life. My statements are not there to say you are wrong just a different perspective of why it is considered "lawful"