Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2015 mustang, here it is

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Snatch Napkin
    replied
    Sweet!! They addressed the shifter location in relation to the cupholders. For some reason that has bugged the shit out of me.

    Leave a comment:


  • FATHERFORD
    replied
    Coyote 5.0

    Utilizing lessons learned in the development of the recent BOSS 302 platform, Ford engineers have improved the Coyote 5.0. They’ve not released the official power numbers yet, except to say expect overt 420 hp and over 390 ft-lbs of torque.

    The top end of the Coyote is all new starting with a brand new cylinder head casting that features revised ports for straighter paths to the valves, and less flow restriction. The heads also feature larger intake, and exhaust valves, and revised intake and exhaust camshafts will also contribute to the Coyote making more power, and breathing better all the way to redline. Stiffer valve springs will help the Coyote howl at higher RPMs as well.

    The variable cam system has been updated as well. New mid-lock phasers enable better control of the camshaft timing through a greater range of engine RPM. This should improve fuel economy, emissions, and hopefully power as well.

    A new, intake manifold is also in use for better low end response and improved emissions compliance. The intake includes charge motion control valves that close off at lower RPMs and improve intake turbulence.

    2015 Coyote Key Features:

    Larger intake valves
    Larger exhaust valves
    Revised intake camshafts
    Revised exhaust camshafts
    Stiffer valve springs – ensures that the valves close completely at high rpm
    New cylinder-head casting – revised ports that provide a straighter path to the valves for less-restrictive intake and exhaust flow; combustion chamber modifications accommodate larger valves
    Sinter forged connecting rods – lighter and more durable for high-rpm operation
    Redesigned piston tops – deeper cutouts clear the new larger valves
    Rebalanced forged crankshaft – supports higher-rpm operation

    2.3 EcoBoost

    A variant of the engine that debuted in the upcoming Lincoln MKC. This engine is an evolution of the 2.0 EcoBoost found in the Focus ST and other vehicles. We expect great things from this little engine as it allows for a lighter car, and hopefully some great performance numbers. “This EcoBoost engine delivers where a Mustang driver expects it to, with a broad, flat torque curve that pours out when you stand on it for easy passing or hustling down a twisty road,” said Pericak.

    Ford has said to expect at least 305 hp and 300 ft-lbs of torque from the little four-cylinder engine.

    Other features of the 2.3 include:

    Forged-steel crankshaft
    Piston-cooling jets
    Steel piston ring carriers
    Premium bearing materials
    Upgraded valve seat materials
    Forged-steel connecting rods
    High-pressure die-cast aluminum cylinder block with ladder-frame bearing caps
    Deep-sump, die-cast aluminum oil pan

    3.7 V6

    The 3.7 will still be available, Ford hasn’t released many details yet except to say expect at least 300 hp and 270 ft-lbs of torque from the fleet favorite engine.

    Transmissions

    Ford is promising the best driving experience yet in manual transmission equipped Mustangs. The Getrag MT-82 six-speed manual is being carried over from the 2011-2014 models. Ford has revised the shift linkage for shorter throws and a crisper feel. They’ve also moved the shifter closer to the drive for easier access, locating it away from the cupholders.


    In the automatic department a six-speed auto is once again available. The auto has been significantly revised. A new case with reinforcing ribs for added strength and reduced weight is part of the package. The clutches have been revised, and the transmission operates at higher temperatures for improved friction characteristics. The output shaft has a new ball bearing support, allowing for 155 mph top speed according to Ford.

    What enthusiasts who choose the automatic will really like though is the steering wheel mounted paddle shfiters that will be standard on all automatic equipped Mustangs. We talked about this a while back in a spy photo story that we ran. In addition to being a bonus for auto owners, those looking to tackle twisty back roads, or even the autocross with the auto equipped Mustang will benefit from the rev-matching downshift feature.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rafa
    replied
    Add me to the group of starting to like it now. I still think it's too busy in the cab even though that's what they were going for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mach1
    replied
    c7 is 3400 right? That would be impressive for a 30k mustang to match something like the C7 which is damn near all aluminum at this point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Snatch Napkin
    replied
    Bigger valves, Boss valve springs, Boss connecting rods, and oil cooler for all 5.0L engines.


    Most of the reports are stating an estimated 3,450lbs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Baron Von Crowder
    replied
    Originally posted by 4bangen View Post
    There is just something wrong with the front end to me. But then again, when the 10 came out I hated the rear end. Now I own one.
    I do think the price of a GT is going to be ridiculous, and the turbo 4 will be nearly as bad.
    I hope that the GT is a higher dollar option than the t4. Actually, I hope that they offer the turbo 4 in a base and a GT option.

    Leave a comment:


  • 46Tbird
    replied
    All rumors have indicated that this is a smaller, lighter car than the S197. The number I've consistently heard is "200 pounds lighter" which would make the GT around 3400-3500lbs. Not light but a step in the right direction. I guess we'll see when they start hitting the streets.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mysticcobrakilla
    replied
    Originally posted by Mach1 View Post
    they must be fat pigs, ford has not mentioned weight
    Yup, I'm thinking the same thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • kirbster
    replied
    Just about every Mustang debut I can remember or paid any attention to (1987) never really blew me away. But I grew to love every generation every since then. I like this one overall with the exception of the big "GT" emblem on the back. Now I'm curious how much this thing will cost.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mach1
    replied
    they must be fat pigs, ford has not mentioned weight

    Leave a comment:


  • Monsoon X
    replied
    Goddangit, I like it! I'd like to see what the "Shelby" variants will look like. Then I might have to snag me one. GT500? Rumored GT350? Rumored FI Coyote? I might be getting me a new Mustang in the next few years.

    The Mustang Eco-Boost:
    Forged Steel crankshaft
    Piston Cooling jets
    Steel piston ring carriers
    Forged steel connecting rods
    High Pressure die-cast alum cyl block with ladder frame bearing caps
    deep-sump, die cast alum oil pan

    Leave a comment:


  • 4bangen
    replied
    There is just something wrong with the front end to me. But then again, when the 10 came out I hated the rear end. Now I own one.
    I do think the price of a GT is going to be ridiculous, and the turbo 4 will be nearly as bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    I like the door panels. It's kind of funny, I think just the different grille and the 5.0 badges made a huge difference in my opinion. lol I always hated that ugly ass honeycomb grill on the 99-04s, and all my New Edges got a Mach 1 delete grille. Hell, the 99 I had I bought the delete grille before I even FOUND the car I was buying because I knew how much it would irritate me. lol
    Very true. My '03 has the delete grill, but of course it also helps that it's a Mach 1 to begin with.

    Leave a comment:


  • 46Tbird
    replied
    The GT looks much better! There is still something frumpy about the lines over the front fenders and into the nose that I don't care for but the tightened up grille is helping. The busy fog lights up front and weird body color parts in the center-rear are ugly but easily dealt wit. That blacked out tail panel looks great and even though they are getting away from "retro" there is a lot of '65-66 fastback in that roofline and rear window shape. Overall I give them an A+.



    Leave a comment:


  • BLAKE
    replied
    Man, the more I see of it, the more I like it. The proportions and shapes of the roof and hips of the car are just great. It's like they took some of the crispness of the 67-68 fastback roof and stopped short of the end of the car like a 65-66. It's a nice blend.

    Can't wait to start seeing them on the road. I need to make more money so I can get a new orange one.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X