University Professors Forum: Pedophilia Is “Natural For Males,”

[talisman]

or oblivious.

This sums up every one of that dumbasses posts.

[Gasser64]

So how does that post say I put so much faith in every theory out there? I'd like to think you're speaking in hyperbole and give you the benefit of the doubt, but know better.... You're quoting a post which I expanded on later when talking about people who take one study as affirmation of their convictions.



Trust me, I fully understand not everyone takes prevalent theories seriously. I'm reminded every time I talk to a creationist, or antivaxxer/faith healer, or, well, you. I would explain to you the logical fallacy you're making here, but apparently you have a distaste for logical thought processes as they are "predictable and discrediting" (somehow that makes sense to you). Well just conclude in hoping that you learn something past your high school memorization of the scientific method.



I change my mind regularly, but typically it takes more than a person who doesn't understand scientific theory and criticizes logic. It also helps if they have beyond a high school understanding of the topics (which I should note doesn't require higher education).

Now back to conceiving your lawn mower powered turbo.

You make entirely too many assumptions. For one the "memorization of the scientific method' was on one of my last college exams not high school. Although i do remember being taught the method in high school. There really isnt much to it, its all pretty simple, you seem to think that its something far more complicated and more difficult than it really is. Maybe for you, but not for others

Your next assumption was that i have a distaste for logical thought processes and i never said 'they' are predictable and discrediting so please dont attempt to twist my words. I said "you" are predictable and discrediting and you dont seem to learn anything from all the other people in that thread who are trying to tell you something. But i guess carry on. And im not sure i understand about a racing lawnmower im not all that familiar with the latest internetz

[exlude]

You make entirely too many assumptions. For one the "memorization of the scientific method' was on one of my last college exams not high school. Although i do remember being taught the method in high school. There really isnt much to it, its all pretty simple, you seem to think that its something far more complicated and more difficult than it really is. Maybe for you, but not for others

Wait, a college class is testing you on the steps of the scientific method?
Well, you confirmed my point. My point was you only know the steps of the scientific method but have yet to fully understand everything involved. Luckily you have a lot of time to grasp it.

Your next assumption was that i have a distaste for logical thought processes and i never said 'they' are predictable and discrediting so please dont attempt to twist my words. I said "you" are predictable and discrediting and you dont seem to learn anything from all the other people in that thread who are trying to tell you something. But i guess carry on. And im not sure i understand about a racing lawnmower im not all that familiar with the latest internetz

I'm predictable in calling out logical fallacy, oh the horror! The fact you see that as an insult is where I can derive your distaste for logic.

All the people, who are all the people? You sure that's the route you want to go? Only one I can figure is svo but the disparity in that is that I wanted to discuss/argue/whatever and he didn't.

[Forever_frost]

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/11/judge-says-abortion-makes-incest-okay/

Judge Says ABORTION Makes Incest Okay, And Incest Is Fine Because It’s Like Homosexuality
3:25 PM 07/11/2014
Photo of Eric Owens
Eric Owens
Education Editor

See All Articles
Email Eric Owens
Subscribe to RSS

A judge in Australia’s most populous state has compared incest and pedophilia to homosexuality because homosexuality, now broadly accepted, used to be illegal and widely considered unnatural as recently as a few decades ago.

The judge, Garry Neilson, also opined that legalized abortion makes the taboo against incest unnecessary because the “only reason” incest remains a crime is to lower the risk of genetic defects in children born from incest, The Sydney Morning Herald reports.

“But even that falls away to an extent [because] there is such ease of contraception and readily access to abortion,” the judge pontificated.

“A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available,’ not having [a] sexual partner,” he also said.

Neilson made the bizarro statements guaranteed to offend virtually everyone while he was presiding over a criminal case back in April.

The disturbing case involves a 58-year-old man charged with raping his younger sister over and over again when he was 17 and she was 10 or 11 years old, and then raping her some more when she was 18 and he was 26.

Prosecutors wanted to submit all this information to a jury. Neilson would not permit the evidence that the man raped his sister when she was an adult. It was a totally different context, he said.

He then mused his way into more trouble by spouting about the triad of abortion, rape and homosexuality as he discussed his evidentiary ruling.

“By that stage they are both mature adults. The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become ‘free’ when the second relationship broke down,” the judge said, according to the Herald.

“The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we’ve come a long way from the 1950s,” he added.

“If this was the ’50s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you’d invariably have, they would say it’s unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone.”

The statements are coming to light now because the Australian Greens, Australia’s main green political party, asked the country’s Judicial Commission to remove or censure Neilson.

On Friday, a judicial official announced that Nielson will has been suspended from his job, notes The Guardian.

Earlier this week, Sally Dowling, a crown prosecutor, asked an appeals court to remove Neilson from the case. She called Neilson’s comments “completely disgraceful,” according to the Herald.

“The reference to abortion is particularly repellent,” she also said, according to The Telegraph.

[exlude]

Oh good lord, lol