Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saw the new 2015 Mustang.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cooter
    replied
    ok, it looks pretty slick in black!

    I've noticed that odd body styles start to look good to me if they're solid performers.

    I hated the 08 Super Duty update, but once I figured out how much ass the truck could kick, they started looking awful purty to me

    Leave a comment:


  • Roscoe
    replied
    Originally posted by STANGGT40 View Post
    I don't know how to explain it, other than the rear end looks droopy. The front looks good, though.
    Is it a hatch or a trunk? Looks like it's trying to be an exotic rather than American muscle...

    Leave a comment:


  • yellowstang
    replied
    Originally posted by STANGGT40 View Post
    I don't know how to explain it, other than the rear end looks droopy. The front looks good, though.
    yeah, starting at the front it looks decent, then the further back down the side you look, the worse it gets. That gas cap is fugly with the way it has that little edge molded into it.

    It almost looks like the car was made by Stretch Armstrong, and he wanted to pull out the back end some. Just doesn't flow right, IMO.

    If you painted this yellow one green, you couldn't tell these 2 apart!

    Leave a comment:


  • sc281
    replied
    Originally posted by Bad Religion View Post
    x2 on the foxbody. dark emerald green hatch, coyote, upgraded brakes and suspension.... I really like the 13-14's, I wonder how many people would trade it in for this.
    Dark emerald green or even bullit green would look great in these new ones I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bad Religion
    replied
    x2 on the foxbody. dark emerald green hatch, coyote, upgraded brakes and suspension.... I really like the 13-14's, I wonder how many people would trade it in for this.

    Leave a comment:


  • STANGGT40
    replied
    I don't know how to explain it, other than the rear end looks droopy. The front looks good, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • dcs13
    replied
    Originally posted by Hmbre97 View Post
    Judging by the pics, I'm guessing you're visiting some potato farms in Idaho?
    Nope, was at the Gilmore Auto Museum in Kalamazoo Michigan. Cool place for car people

    Leave a comment:


  • Sgt Beavis
    replied
    As much as I love the design, I have to admit it looks horrible in yellow.

    Leave a comment:


  • scootro
    replied




    Leave a comment:


  • SMKR
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • BLAKE
    replied
    Originally posted by Nash B. View Post
    Now you listen to me, jerkoff: if you're not part of the solution, you're a part of the problem. Quit being part of the fucking problem and put the other guy back on!
    Hah! Hah, thanks Officer McClane.

    Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
    I hate to point it out but some cars are ass ugly and stay that way. The Mustang IIs have never been popular. The 71-73 are on the fence. The 79-82 fox cars even looked like shit. Maybe if they do something similar to what they did with the fox this car might look better but there are areas in the body that I don't care for. I don't care for the way the trunk meets the back window or the way the ass end hangs out, those things aren't going to change.
    Yeah, time has not been kind to the years you mentioned and for the most part I agree. That said, I personally don't think the 15 suffers from the problems that those did. But, eye of the beer holder and all that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Broncojohnny
    replied
    Originally posted by BLAKE View Post
    Time is on my side. This happens every time a car gets redesigned; everybody freaks out. Happened in 94. Happened in 99. Happened in 05 and 2010 too. 2 years from now a big chunk of the board will have this new body style and the consensus will have shifted.

    What will be interesting is if you do the same, or if you remember this conversation and decide to be heard-headed about it. I don't really care either way. You did seem to like the 05 though...

    I hate to point it out but some cars are ass ugly and stay that way. The Mustang IIs have never been popular. The 71-73 are on the fence. The 79-82 fox cars even looked like shit. Maybe if they do something similar to what they did with the fox this car might look better but there are areas in the body that I don't care for. I don't care for the way the trunk meets the back window or the way the ass end hangs out, those things aren't going to change.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nash B.
    replied
    Originally posted by BLAKE View Post
    By that definition, the vast majority of stock cars look bad. Maybe it's a perception difference, I'm just focusing on the intrinsic aesthetics of the car. Body shape and proportion. We all know wheels and stance help and are easily changed.
    Now you listen to me, jerkoff: if you're not part of the solution, you're a part of the problem. Quit being part of the fucking problem and put the other guy back on!

    Leave a comment:


  • mstng86
    replied
    The stance looks wrong, the ass end looks too narrow, and the way the whole front end slopes downwards all make it look ugly from a rear side shot. From the front angles look right. The rear view just looks all wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • BLAKE
    replied
    Originally posted by Baba Ganoush View Post
    Wheels/stance/trim are half of the looks, if not more. So yes, these items make or break the overall impression and the yellow one looks like shit, as do any stock v6's of old. That gray one above - tits.
    By that definition, the vast majority of stock cars look bad. Maybe it's a perception difference, I'm just focusing on the intrinsic aesthetics of the car. Body shape and proportion. We all know wheels and stance help and are easily changed.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X