Originally posted by BMCSean
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
Ridiculous law regarding teen sex...
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Oh you're definitely an asshole, what with the constant mindless insults and all. Its odd that seem to almost take some kind of pride in being an asshole. Which itself, is an insult because its a hole shit flies out of. Just like your mouth.Originally posted by BMCSean View PostI don't think you are rude at all, just stupid. I'm friends with several board members in "real life", one happens to be one of my best friends. If saying what I think makes me an asshole, then I'm an asshole, but I'd rather be consistent than fake.Last edited by Gasser64; 03-12-2015, 08:52 PM.WH
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 No it doesn't say that she posted them while she was 13. But it is implied that she posted 13 year old pictures of herself while she was 19. Even if she was 40 its still a picture of a 13 year old.Originally posted by Gasser64 View PostDoesn't seem like it. Seems like that would be like a gateway to doing all sorts of other illegal activities. But it doesn't say she posted them on a website at age 13 either. I guess it would sort of depend on the age of consent laws in the area. What's the lowest age of consent in the U.S? 15? Can't remember
 .
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Still, since it was of herself, it seems like a "don't do that again you dumbass" and a nice big fine would suffice. Instead of charging her with some kind of child pornography. I know that's asking too much, for some kind of damn sense to be used in the rule of law.Originally posted by jewozzy View PostNo it doesn't say that she posted them while she was 13. But it is implied that she posted 13 year old pictures of herself while she was 19. Even if she was 40 its still a picture of a 13 year old.WH
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I agree that this there is no victim and the pictures are of herself so there should be no charges...unless she puts them out to the public. I guess if someone attempts suicide and fails, then they should be charged with attempted murder? Dumb laws we have.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 If she only has the pics of herself and they were discovered on a traffic stop or something like that in a folder OK I would agree. I'm assuming it was posted on the net and that's how law enforcement came into contact with her. I could be wrong though.Originally posted by davbrucas View PostI agree that this there is no victim and the pictures are of herself so there should be no charges...unless she puts them out to the public. I guess if someone attempts suicide and fails, then they should be charged with attempted murder? Dumb laws we have.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 The gals BF sold dope. Her computer was taken by the feds when they arrested her BF. They found her pictures of herself when they "Carnivored" her computer. They charged her with the kiddy porn to strong arm her into becoming a witness against her BF; she refused. The BFs case fell apart and is gone but they are still charging her for having pictures of herself.Originally posted by jewozzy View PostNo it doesn't say that she posted them while she was 13. But it is implied that she posted 13 year old pictures of herself while she was 19. Even if she was 40 its still a picture of a 13 year old.Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I guess she is the victim then...Originally posted by svo855 View PostThe gals BF sold dope. Her computer was taken by the feds when they arrested her BF. They found her pictures of herself when they "Carnivored" her computer. They charged her with the kiddy porn to strong arm her into becoming a witness against her BF; she refused. The BFs case fell apart and is gone but they are still charging her for having pictures of herself."If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Spot on. This is also why I can't stand the drug laws.Originally posted by racrguy View PostTo be a crime there must be a victim, IMO. If the perpetrator and the "victim" are the same person, there is no crime.Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.
 Comment

Comment