Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CHL Fail

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AnthonyS
    replied
    Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
    Shiiiit. I'll be 43 with a closet full of skeletons. Doubtful.
    As long as you haven't snorted coke of a hookers back while exploring her butt hole with your pee pee, you probably have a shot. Heck you probably have a shot even if you have as long as you didn't get caught on video.

    Leave a comment:


  • AnthonyS
    replied
    Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
    You're correct. Jefferson believed that current generations shouldn't be governed by the dead and suggested a scrap-heaping and rewrite ever 19-20 years. After going through an in-depth look into the commerce clause, due process, and equal protection, I tend to agree with him. The language has been used against itself to create total power for the government.

    Look at how courts, congress, and the executive have weaseled their way around the constitution to find outcomes favorable to their agendas.
    Pretty cool to know that some people do get it..... Also downright scary isn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Then you have flat out unconstitutional actions like creating the EPA, firearm regulations, DEA, ATF, DHS, Dep of Education, Dep of Energy, Dep of labor....

    Leave a comment:


  • sig239
    replied
    Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
    Plus 200+ years of case law, interpretation, application, etc. Reading 1 amendment, taken only as an amendment is one thing, but to assume that is how it is applied (justly or unjustly) is naive and misses a lot of precedence.
    obama care less and the gay marriage ruling come to mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    Originally posted by helosailor View Post
    So, a perfect candidate. I'll start looking into yard signs.
    I have been vasectomized, so there would be no Strom Thurmond moments.

    Leave a comment:


  • helosailor
    replied
    Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
    Shiiiit. I'll be 43 with a closet full of skeletons. Doubtful.
    So, a perfect candidate. I'll start looking into yard signs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    Originally posted by helosailor View Post
    Look at Sean, sounding like a Constitutional attorney. Sean 2020?
    Shiiiit. I'll be 43 with a closet full of skeletons. Doubtful.

    Leave a comment:


  • helosailor
    replied
    Look at Sean, sounding like a Constitutional attorney. Sean 2020?

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Any new info on the story?

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
    You're correct. Jefferson believed that current generations shouldn't be governed by the dead and suggested a scrap-heaping and rewrite ever 19-20 years. After going through an in-depth look into the commerce clause, due process, and equal protection, I tend to agree with him. The language has been used against itself to create total power for the government.

    Look at how courts, congress, and the executive have weaseled their way around the constitution to find outcomes favorable to their agendas.
    I can argue with none of this

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    Originally posted by juiceweezl View Post
    Not to mention there's at least four words in your post alone that go above most people's comprehension level...
    You're correct. Jefferson believed that current generations shouldn't be governed by the dead and suggested a scrap-heaping and rewrite ever 19-20 years. After going through an in-depth look into the commerce clause, due process, and equal protection, I tend to agree with him. The language has been used against itself to create total power for the government.

    Look at how courts, congress, and the executive have weaseled their way around the constitution to find outcomes favorable to their agendas.

    Leave a comment:


  • juiceweezl
    replied
    Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
    Plus 200+ years of case law, interpretation, application, etc. Reading 1 amendment, taken only as an amendment is one thing, but to assume that is how it is applied (justly or unjustly) is naive and misses a lot of precedence.
    Not to mention there's at least four words in your post alone that go above most people's comprehension level...

    Leave a comment:


  • Cobraman
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    Is this an opportunity to school him on the constitution?
    How do you know when someone is in law school? They'll tell you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    It's at most 4 pages. In English.
    Plus 200+ years of case law, interpretation, application, etc. Reading 1 amendment, taken only as an amendment is one thing, but to assume that is how it is applied (justly or unjustly) is naive and misses a lot of precedence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    It's at most 4 pages. In English.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X