Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chevy Tahoe

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Treybiz
    replied
    Originally posted by Grimpala View Post
    Rumor is that the 16 or 17 Burb will be coming back with a 3/4T option and a possibility of a Duramax power plant.
    And I will be in line. Loved the excursion I drove for a bit and considered picking one up a while back but the wife wasn't having it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Grimpala
    replied
    Rumor is that the 16 or 17 Burb will be coming back with a 3/4T option and a possibility of a Duramax power plant.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pro88LX
    replied
    have a 2014 yukon SLT 2wd 5.3 and ZERO issues here with 30k so far.

    Leave a comment:


  • snacksnack
    replied
    It removes oil from the lifters and shoots it up on to the bottom of the Pistons which causes oil burning issues. There are fixes for it and or just tune it out.

    Leave a comment:


  • motoman
    replied
    Originally posted by Denny
    The Displacement on Demand crap does have a tendency to cause oiling issues.
    What's this everyone has been referring to?

    Leave a comment:


  • 4EyedTurd
    replied
    We have an 08, it's been rock solid but a turd with the 4.8. It can't pull a greasy string out of a cats ass.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2011GT
    replied
    Originally posted by jluv View Post
    Bah! Tiff's 4Runner with the 4.7 still feels quick to me, and the Sequoia I am in now with the 5.7 feels really good for such a boat.



    Maybe that was it, but it just felt extremely underpowered. Maybe there was actually something wrong with the one I had.
    The rental I had was actually a GMC so maybe it had a 6.2 instead of the 5.3?

    Leave a comment:


  • BigDumbRedneck
    replied
    Wife has an '07 and loves it. It's been a great vehicle. No issues at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chili
    replied
    Originally posted by jluv View Post
    Bah! Tiff's 4Runner with the 4.7 still feels quick to me, and the Sequoia I am in now with the 5.7 feels really good for such a boat.
    Yeah, but you are at about 500' elevation right now vs 5,000+ when you were in the Suburban.

    And a Suburban weighs a good 1k lbs more than the 4Runner.

    Leave a comment:


  • jluv
    replied
    Originally posted by Chili View Post
    Like I told you a couple months ago, your basis of comparison on power levels is all out of whack because of your 1000HP Monster Truck! lol
    Bah! Tiff's 4Runner with the 4.7 still feels quick to me, and the Sequoia I am in now with the 5.7 feels really good for such a boat.

    Originally posted by Baron Von Crowder View Post
    that, or the rental fleet spec suburban came with a 3.08 rear gear?
    Maybe that was it, but it just felt extremely underpowered. Maybe there was actually something wrong with the one I had.

    Leave a comment:


  • Treybiz
    replied
    Wife has a Yukon Denali. 6.2 and AWD. I'll steal it from her when she wants a newer one.

    Fit and Finish is on par with most other GM stuff. We have no complaints. The leather is perfect with 52k on it. (My silverado is black leather as well and I just hit 115k; it's still perfect except for the expected bolster wear which is only lines at this point. No cracking or Tearing)

    5.3 is fine if it's got the right gear ratio and stockish size tires/wheels.

    6.2 is mo betta. I won't own anything without one again unless I go back to a diesel for myself.

    Higher trim levels equal more gadets which can cause electrical problems. We had to replace our ground cable under warranty. Otherwise it's been a great truck.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chili
    replied
    I'd probably keep the factory wheels, but I'd be happy with something like this:

    Leave a comment:


  • Chili
    replied
    Originally posted by Baron Von Crowder View Post
    that, or the rental fleet spec suburban came with a 3.08 rear gear?
    Good point.. The Tahoe we had had plenty of power, and we went over some of the same passes. Not sure of the weight or gearing differences they may have had. I will say that the pedal was much more firm that my '05 (which is the very springy kind). You had to use a good amount of force to push it down.

    I hated the current body style when they came out, but after renting that Tahoe, I am really starting to want one.

    Maybe in a few years when they cost $20k used, vs $50k+ for a new one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Baron Von Crowder
    replied
    Originally posted by Chili View Post
    Like I told you a couple months ago, your basis of comparison on power levels is all out of whack because of your 1000HP Monster Truck! lol
    that, or the rental fleet spec suburban came with a 3.08 rear gear?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chili
    replied
    Originally posted by jluv View Post
    I rented a Suburban earlier this year and thought it was the most underpowered slug I've ever driven. It would barely make it up and over some of the mountain passes. Merging onto the highway was scary, and forget about passing anyone. Surprisingly, for as big as they are, the interior is anything but roomy for a big guy like myself.

    Bleh.

    OP, have you checked out the Toyota Sequoia? I'm in one now for a rental, and it's better in every way, except maybe the looks department.
    Like I told you a couple months ago, your basis of comparison on power levels is all out of whack because of your 1000HP Monster Truck! lol

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X