Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Buying A Repo From Credit Union
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by quikag View Post381hp and 401lb/ft of torque from a 32V DOHC 5.7L engine with 90% of the torque available as low as 2,000rpm. Yeah, sounds real weak.To bothOriginally posted by DennyThis is what makes it unbelievable... because it isn't true.
Well, like I said. Go for it. Have fun. Have a blast. Nevermind all the variables like the lift, and the fact that there is the possibility that it could have been that particular truck. Again, I said "very limited". And that "I" wouldn't buy one, based on "my" experience. But by all means, have at it. And read waaaay to much into it.
Well with "stupider" I wouldn't bet on it being after trying to do it.Originally posted by juiceweezl View PostWhy do I always feel stupider after trying to comprehend anything Gasser posts?
Leave a comment:
-
Why do I always feel stupider after trying to comprehend anything Gasser posts?
Leave a comment:
-
In regards to the towing capacity, my Honda Pilot pulls my similar pontoon. Water in bait tanks, full tank of gas, 2 full coolers and sometimes a deck box full of junk. Granted no major hills and you damned well know it's pulling the boat/trailer, but I highly doubt a Tundra or even a Tacoma would have issues yanking a pontoon up a hill or mountain.
Edit: Hey, ease up on the pontoon bashing!
Leave a comment:
-
lol, a junk ass pontoon that you could never afford. I must have junked it out really fast too. Record junking time. Holy shit you're stupid.Originally posted by bcoop View PostWell that just can't be. The resident inbred stumpfucker says it can't even pull his junk ass pontoon!
Leave a comment:
-
Ironically, calling someone a retard when the simple measurement was that the truck failed going uphill and was losing speed. Yeah, I'm the retard here. I'm sure the basic logic of that is lost on you though.Originally posted by bcoop View PostSo I felt it prudent to warn him that you're a fucking retard, and never know what you're talking about.
Erm, no. Its was some other guy in a thread, who you also labeled as a "nobody". Short memory, or just a bad one? I never said anywhere that Rodney PM'd me. As far as I know, he never has.Originally posted by bcoop View PostThose must be in the same pm's that Rodney is always mentioned, yet nobody has ever seen them.
Speaking of talking out of your ass, we get more blind assumptions and poor reading comprehension, I see. But that's usual with you. Go back and reread. I clearly said "my very limited experience". What is it about "very limited" that you don't understand? Hell what is it about any of this that you don't understand? You seem to have exceedingly poor powers of perception.Originally posted by bcoop View PostI've rented Tundras several times, so there goes you talking out of your ass again. 4 of my coworkers also own them. One is on Tundra #3, one is on his second, and the old lady's brother buys a new one every 2 years. But please, continue on... Clearly you have much more experience.
Alright so confirmed butthurt. Gotcha. You can be safely written off now, like the full blown drooling retard that you are. No attempted brag was made, as if anyone would. Yeah, 87 vs 2014. Hellz yeah 87 is way betterr hurrrr!! More of your inability to comprehend a limited and basic observation. 87 truck pulls well enough up hills with AC on. 2014 truck falters, and does not pull up hill well enough with AC on. Is that simple enough for your limited little mind to understand?Originally posted by bcoop View PostYour truck built in 1987 would get it's ass drug by a 4 cylinder Camry with jet skis in tow. Shut the fuck up.
Leave a comment:
-
Hell the Tundra V6 can pull roughly 4,500lbs which is more than most pontoons weigh, at least cheaper ones. That is the only scenario that makes sense. I would imagine a possibility of a 4.0L V6 would be huffing up a grade with a boat in tow, especially with a lift kit. Or MAYBE the 4.7L mid-grade V8 in the older Tundra. It wasn't the strongest engine, but it was still solid and reliable.
The 5.7, no way in hell.
Leave a comment:
-
Well that just can't be. The resident inbred stumpfucker says it can't even pull his junk ass pontoon!Originally posted by quikag View Post381hp and 401lb/ft of torque from a 32V DOHC 5.7L engine with 90% of the torque available as low as 2,000rpm. Yeah, sounds real weak.
Leave a comment:
-
381hp and 401lb/ft of torque from a 32V DOHC 5.7L engine with 90% of the torque available as low as 2,000rpm. Yeah, sounds real weak.
Leave a comment:
-
You just have a really long history of talking out of your ass. So I felt it prudent to warn him that you're a fucking retard, and never know what you're talking about.Originally posted by Gasser64 View PostGlad to see you're still butthurt about all our previous arguments, and that you actually that think you're "somebody" and I'm "nobody".
Those must be in the same pm's that Rodney is always mentioned, yet nobody has ever seen them.Originally posted by Gasser64 View PostPlus coming from an idiot who others here have referred to as "a grade A sack of shit"
I've rented Tundras several times, so there goes you talking out of your ass again. 4 of my coworkers also own them. One is on Tundra #3, one is on his second, and the old lady's brother buys a new one every 2 years. But please, continue on... Clearly you have much more experience.Originally posted by Gasser64 View Postand who has likely never even driven one
Your truck built in 1987 would get it's ass drug by a 4 cylinder Camry with jet skis in tow. Shut the fuck up.Originally posted by Gasser64 View PostDon't let me stop you from wasting $35k plus on some dinky shit that gets outperformed by a truck from 1987.
Leave a comment:
-
Glad to see you're still butthurt about all our previous arguments, and that you actually that think you're "somebody" and I'm "nobody". That's actually really funny. Plus coming from an idiot who others here have referred to as "a grade A sack of shit" and who has likely never even driven one, I wouldn't put to much stock into what this lily little fag says.Originally posted by bcoop View Post
I would not base any decision on anything that dumbass says, just my opinion.
And hey, I just calls em as I sees em. You guys go right ahead and get you one. Have fun. Don't let me stop you from wasting $35k plus on some dinky shit that gets outperformed by a truck from 1987. Drop $10k off of the price and you might have a point. Or go do a little research and put them up against Ford, Chevy, or Dodge. See how well that works out for the beloved tundra, when it comes to towing.Last edited by Gasser64; 12-14-2015, 01:03 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: