what are you guys paying for 5.3l

[Baron Von Crowder]

the quadcam 4.6 isnt affordable. its huge torqueless and it has way to many parts on the front of it. you can get a stock lsx add cam intake exhaust and make way more power.

It's a joke, but that swap was stupid cheap to do since the engine was essentially free after parting out and taking the ready of the car to the crusher.

[Mike]

[89FivePointOh]

didn't yours break at a quarter that?

His broke coming out of the Sonic driveway...

[JC316]

the quadcam 4.6 isnt affordable. its huge torqueless and it has way to many parts on the front of it. you can get a stock lsx add cam intake exhaust and make way more power.

It's not torqueless, it just takes forever to reach the torque. The biggest problem with it is how wide it is.

[steve-0]

bought a complete longblock in mansfield for 320$

[bobs94formula]

I have a nice one complete with a 4l60e for 1k

Wiring harness with it too?

[Sleeper]

Do it bob. The old black bitch would run good chevy powered with a 70mm pushing it.

[Aceman85turbo]

the problem with both lsx and quadcam 4.6's is there arent any transmissions in the affordable range.

You will spend much much more on a T56 setup for 500hp than you will on an engine

[bobs94formula]

Do it bob. The old black bitch would run good chevy powered with a 70mm pushing it.

Nah it'll be for a 67 Chevy C10 project. Although I have thought about that option too

[Sleeper]

the problem with both lsx and quadcam 4.6's is there arent any transmissions in the affordable range.

You will spend much much more on a T56 setup for 500hp than you will on an engine

Aint nothing wrong with a good ol th400 of th350

[black2002ls]

where are the best places to look for these. I'm trying to talk myself into putting a 5.3 into my s-10