Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cowboys 2016
Collapse
X
-
Looks like Romo will sit after the bye week, The Rapsheet is reporting that Romo has not fully recovered from his broken Wishbone...
-
Tony is so far from outstanding it's canyonesque. His decision making has sucked consistently. His run, chuck it and pray skills have resulted in many Ls that might have been Ws. After 10 seasons as a starter he can't even get the play started before delay of game. Romos nut huggers including Jerry have had way more than enough tries. It never happened. It's time to move on. Trade Dez too and get 3 younger players that may develop and round out the team. Dak has completions to a whole team of receivers Tony hasn't even met yet. He is witten and Dez blind any defense can stop him. Cover two guys rush the rest smash his back and/or collar bone. Viola.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, Bledsoe was replaced by Romo in the 2nd half of the Giants game in which he was losing, and Romo was announced as the new starter the next week by Parcells.Originally posted by The King View PostTo refresh my memory without me having to resort to Google, didn't Romo first get his start as a replacement for a mediocre Bledsoe? It would only seem fitting (somewhat) that Tony go out in the same manner.
But the phrase "getting Drew Bledsoed" people refer to, is when the Patriots replaced Bledsoe with Tom Brady after the Jets knocked him out of the game, almost killing him, and then Bellichek made Bledsoe compete for his job when he came back. Bledsoe never started another game for the Patriots after that injury.
Leave a comment:
-
Here is what I think of the Tony vs Dak argument. Obviously everything is working for the cowboys right now, they're committed to the run, they're getting outstanding production out of Beasley and even Terrance Williams. With the methodical pacing, they're keeping the defense off the field and rested up.
Now, if you go to Romo things are going to be different. First off, he has a loyalty to Witten and Dez, he tries to forces balls to them and it results in picks. Secondly they go more pass oriented in the play calling, which conserves time. Tony goes for the big play, which happens and then the defense is right back out on the field. The final thing is that Romo runs the play clock down to 1 on every fucking play, that not only tires out the O line, but it allows the opposing defense to time out the blitz.
Tony is an outstanding QB, but he hasn't been able to get the job done in 10 years. Lets see what Dak is capable of.
Leave a comment:
-
I must have listened to at least 30-40 cases on why we should stick with Dak, or why we should go back to Romo. Nick Wight's argument makes perfect logical sense. It's a great video worth the 15 minutes.
Leave a comment:
-
Unfortunately because I'm a believer in the old school NFL where one doesn't lose his job to injury. Not his fault some fucking monkey breaks his spine as he's sliding as to not get hit. Fuck the Seahawks cheating ass', it was a pre-season game not a game that counts in the standings. So IMO he shouldn't lose his starting job and if the Rook were struggling, I'm sure everyone would be screaming for Romo to get back on the field.Originally posted by lowfast View PostWhy "unfortunately" Someone better comes along and they replace you. We are not talking about guys losing their livelihood. Romo already has about $100M so I don't feel sorry for someone if their performance declines or even if it doesn't, the best player should play, not to mention the value of being able to stay on the field and not be in a constant state of injury.
I like Romo and frankly this is the best that could happen to him. He will still get paid and possibly not continue to get injured and risk being able to play with his kids in the future.
The Rook has solidified his role as a future starter and if Romo comes back and starts sucking or gets hurt again, I'm all for bringing the Rook back, but he's also not winning all by himself either, its a team game and the team is playing very well...
Leave a comment:
-
Why "unfortunately" Someone better comes along and they replace you. We are not talking about guys losing their livelihood. Romo already has about $100M so I don't feel sorry for someone if their performance declines or even if it doesn't, the best player should play, not to mention the value of being able to stay on the field and not be in a constant state of injury.Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostYes, he pissed off the Tuna and in came Romo. It's not the first time this has happened in the NFL and it won't be the last unfortunately...
I like Romo and frankly this is the best that could happen to him. He will still get paid and possibly not continue to get injured and risk being able to play with his kids in the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, he pissed off the Tuna and in came Romo. It's not the first time this has happened in the NFL and it won't be the last unfortunately...Originally posted by The King View PostTo refresh my memory without me having to resort to Google, didn't Romo first get his start as a replacement for a mediocre Bledsoe? It would only seem fitting (somewhat) that Tony go out in the same manner.
Leave a comment:
-
I took it off of the NFL website, but it might be one of their beat writers, but yes #4 or #3 works for me! And yes we do have a rough stretch coming up. I was hoping to be 3-3 or 2-4 until Romo came back, but the Rook is playing very good. I also have to give props to the OL and that running game and they may be the very reason we are having the success that we are having. The Defense has stepped up as well...
Leave a comment:
-
To refresh my memory without me having to resort to Google, didn't Romo first get his start as a replacement for a mediocre Bledsoe? It would only seem fitting (somewhat) that Tony go out in the same manner.Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostRomo, when hes had some time to throw the ball hes been very good, but we all know he can't run and that's what gives Dak the upper hand. Also the long ball, Romo hasn't thrown the long ball very well or at all and we know the Rook can spin it down the field. I know Daddy Jerry has a lot of money tied on up Romo this season and if he comes back he will be on a very short leash, which sucks because I'm a Romo fan, but hey, he did the same thing to Drew Bledsoe when his skills deteriorated, lol...
Leave a comment:
-
Drew Bledsoe had skills?Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostRomo, when hes had some time to throw the ball hes been very good, but we all know he can't run and that's what gives Dak the upper hand. Also the long ball, Romo hasn't thrown the long ball very well or at all and we know the Rook can spin it down the field. I know Daddy Jerry has a lot of money tied on up Romo this season and if he comes back he will be on a very short leash, which sucks because I'm a Romo fan, but hey, he did the same thing to Drew Bledsoe when his skills deteriorated, lol...
Leave a comment:
-
Romo, when hes had some time to throw the ball hes been very good, but we all know he can't run and that's what gives Dak the upper hand. Also the long ball, Romo hasn't thrown the long ball very well or at all and we know the Rook can spin it down the field. I know Daddy Jerry has a lot of money tied on up Romo this season and if he comes back he will be on a very short leash, which sucks because I'm a Romo fan, but hey, he did the same thing to Drew Bledsoe when his skills deteriorated, lol...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: