South Korea vs. North Korea (Conflict Thread)

[mstng86]

You don't need a nuclear bomb to destroy pyongyang, just one good gust of wind. That place is a shit hole. I honestly don't know how much longer we will go before we finally just get fed up and end up going in there.

Seems like Iraq all over again. Only this time they probably due have some type of nuclear technology. But, we all know Obama would NEVER start a war. He doesn't have the spine for that, or the popularity to get backing.

[78X]

NKorea warns region is on brink of war

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20101126/D9JNPTIO2.html

"As Washington and Seoul pressed China to use its influence on Pyongyang to ease tensions amid worries of all-out war, the U.S. prepared to send a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to South Korean waters for joint military drills in the Yellow Sea starting Sunday."

[bubbaearl]

i think it is time to finish this one . let the pencil dick leader starve his country and eventually piss off china. as for china i see no reason for concern . china will go the way of russia. what they are doing is something that will implode sooner or later. without our spending economy they will crash and burn fast. maybe it is time for a little protectionism . cant be any worse than what is going on now. personally i think we need to even the field on trade. they need us much more than we need them .

[BP]

Could this have anything to do with the China/Russia currency situation? They recently decided to ditch the dollar for trading between the two. It's a giant communist love fest over there right now.

Figure out a way to take out China and the rest of the commies will fall with them. All we'd need to do is let Taiwan and Japan go on a shopping spree with our defense contractors and sit back and watch for a couple of years. It'd help here with jobs now and with China no longer in play our national debt would be a thing of the past.

[Denny]

Just heard on Armed Forces Network that there are reports of more explosions coming from the north. Not sure if it is their "training" or not.

[Denny]

It's the Fedz fault!

By doing a thorough investigation, identifying all contributing factors, leading to a root cause; I'm sure the Fed will pop up somewhere.

[Denny]

Yes but nothing compared to china. SK and indias troops combined I bet don't amount to what china has. Plus I am sure china trumps india in technology by far.

I think many people will lose a bet on India's tech levels. There are reasons they've been so quiet lately.

[Machx2]

I beg to differ. If they're trying to decide whether to back NK or not, they're not wanting to build a two-front war on their turf. India has a few more troops than just the 36K.

Yes but nothing compared to china. SK and indias troops combined I bet don't amount to what china has. Plus I am sure china trumps india in technology by far.

[slow99]

It's the Fedz fault!

[Denny]

I don't think china will lose any sleep over 36000 troops.

I beg to differ. If they're trying to decide whether to back NK or not, they're not wanting to build a two-front war on their turf. India has a few more troops than just the 36K.

[78X]

north korea says war is near on the penninsila

http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE6AP08T20101126?ca=rdt

[Machx2]

BBC is now reporting that India is deploying 36000 troops to the border of China. No word about any response from China yet.

I don't think china will lose any sleep over 36000 troops.

[YALE]

What chess move would that be in favor for?

They have occasional pissing contests over the border between China and Assam. There's still some disputed border there, and between Kashmir and Tibet.

[78X]

BBC is now reporting that India is deploying 36000 troops to the border of China. No word about any response from China yet.

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7020627617?India%20Sees%20Red%20As%20China%20Builds%20Border%20Infrastructure

[78X]

BBC is now reporting that India is deploying 36000 troops to the border of China. No word about any response from China yet.

What chess move would that be in favor for?