Obama tells Bishops off

[Forever_frost]

You don't have to quote it. I didn't realize they were all intrastate. Thanks.

I knew I didn't have to quote it for you but we have Ovary's Dad running around and he's pretty much a tree stump.

[Vertnut]

I'm going to have to disagree. In a true free society. There is no such thing as a privilege. Privileges can be revoked. The government does not have the right to tell any one they can not do something (revoking a privilege) as long as what your doing does not infringe on the rights of others. The state on the other hand can do this.

So what is "driving"? If you're vision is bad, the state can tell you not to drive. The state can't tell you to not live. You can choose not to drive, so you won't need insurance. You HAVE to live, so they can force insurance on you? I'm not sure what your disagreeing with.

[Vertnut]

Says allot about the constituents.



You mean that pipeline that would be used to deliver oil from Canada only to export it from the gulf. The one that would create 20,000 200,000 400,000 1 million jobs. (whats the number now?). The one that would magically lower the price of gas, even though the other ones in existence haven't. Besides it was only rejected on the bases of the GOP wanted to expedite building without regard of any environmental impact. This pipeline will have no effect on you, me, the price of gas or jobs of any significant amount. It will get built, just not haphazardly.

Wrong. Again.

[Jimbo]

Wrong. Again.

LOL. I feel as if I am reading some running gag, an ironic farce, when I read averysdad posts.

[Avery'sDad]

Wrong. Again.

Cmon really. I know your debating skills are better than that.

[QUOTE=Forever_frost;618641]You mean "you're" not "your". If a woman needs anything, she has the ability to go pay $3.00 a month to get birth control or find an insurance company that provides it. Perhaps you can show me in the constitution where the federal government has the ability to demand anything about insurance.

And Rush wasn't attacking this bitch because she wa
s a woman. She was attacked because she evidently spends 3k a year on bc which everyone else can get for 3 bucks a month and has decided that since she likes fucking, WE should be paying for yiit.[/oQUOTE]

No. No woman hating attitude here. Just a man trying to express his point if view. Please strike the name calling.

[Avery'sDad]

Wrong. Again.

Cmon really. I know your debating skills are better than that.

[QUOTE=Forever_frost;618641]You mean "you're" not "your". If a woman needs anything, she has the ability to go pay $3.00 a month to get birth control or find an insurance company that provides it. Perhaps you can show me in the constitution where the federal government has the ability to demand anything about insurance.

And Rush wasn't attacking this bitch because she wa
s a woman. She was attacked because she evidently spends 3k a year on bc which everyone else can get for 3 bucks a month and has decided that since she likes fucking, WE should be paying for yiit.[/oQUOTE]

No. No woman hating attitude here. Just a man trying to express his point if view. Please strike the name calling from the record.

[Vertnut]

As usual, you pull numbers out of your sphincter, then call it a "debate"? You're way over your head...again.

[Forever_frost]

.[/oQUOTE]

No. No woman hating attitude here. Just a man trying to express his point if view. Please strike the name calling from the record.

I'll apologize when Mahr does. I didn't see you getting pissed about him calling Palin a cunt and a twat but you're pissed about this ditzy bitch being called a slut? You're a two faced cock gobbler ass clown.

[YALE]

And Rush wasn't attacking this bitch because she was a woman. She was attacked because she evidently spends 3k a year on bc which everyone else can get for 3 bucks a month and has decided that since she likes fucking, WE should be paying for it.

Her speech to congress was on behalf of her friend that uses specific birth control to prevent ovarian cysts. It wasn't about sex, and his position that a girl uses bc every time she has sex is a highly uninformed one. It's not like Viagra.

[Vertnut]

Her speech to congress was on behalf of her friend that uses specific birth control to prevent ovarian cysts. It wasn't about sex, and his position that a girl uses bc every time she has sex is a highly uninformed one. It's not like Viagra.

Did you hear her speech? I did. She's been an activist for years, and was invited to speak by design. She was a plant. I didn't know that rubbers helped ovarian cysts? Condoms (and the price of them) was brought up in her oratory, too. Free birth control is available at any Planned Parenthood office. You're right, though...It's not about birth control. Just control.

Her paying $1000 a year for birth control shoud be a dead giveaway that she's a shill.

[Forever_frost]

Her speech to congress was on behalf of her friend that uses specific birth control to prevent ovarian cysts. It wasn't about sex, and his position that a girl uses bc every time she has sex is a highly uninformed one. It's not like Viagra.

I heard her speech to Congress. She blatantly lied about the cost, she chose to engage in sexual activity, she chose to go to that school, the both chose to utilize the school's programs they knew didn't provide birth control coverage, ignored available resources that do provide BC very cheaply and demanded government do it. That makes her a lying slut

[Treasure Chest]

Fair enough. They're still on the wrong end of this BC thing, and that's what all this is about.

I have to disagree on this one. The federal government has no right to tell the church what they should cover. The employees know, going into their employment, what the church's stance is on birth control, and if that's a deal breaker, they are free to turn the job down or pay for birth control out of pocket.

[YALE]

Well, I guess I'm wrong.

[Treasure Chest]

Well, I guess I'm wrong.

It's not much different than someone signing a morality clause to gain admission to a Christian university, then bitching when they get kicked out for being caught in a compromising position. It sucks, but the expectations are well defined.

[YALE]

It's not much different than someone signing a morality clause to gain admission to a Christian university, then bitching when they get kicked out for being caught in a compromising position. It sucks, but the expectations are well defined.

Now that, I understand.