Originally posted by Forever_frost
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
RNC changes rules last minute
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
perfect example displayed again. You're not about finding realistic solutions. You're about whining and complaining.Originally posted by teal93derp View PostThat's right, because when you're on the side of liberty there is no compromising. DR Paul supporters know there is no difference between the two goldman sachs candidates, except their skin color."When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I'm not whining or complaining. The only one's I see whining are romney supporters bitching about DR Paul's write in supporters. If his following is so minimal and he doesn't have a chance, the Romney supporters shouldn't have anything to worry about. I'm simply stating the facts. Romney or Obama is not a realistic solution to anything unless you're wanting less freedoms and more of the same policies IMO. It's cool, we can agree to disagree. You are entitled to your opinion.Originally posted by CJ View Postperfect example displayed again. You're not about finding realistic solutions. You're about whining and complaining.Last edited by teal93derp; 08-26-2012, 03:45 PM.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Realistic? No, unrealistic isn't voting for Romney who is the actual candidate, unrealistic is writing in someone who didn't even win enough deligates in his home state. THAT'S unrealisticOriginally posted by teal93derp View PostI'm not whining or complaining. I'm simply stating the facts. Romney or Obama is not a realistic solution to anything unless you're wanting less freedoms and more of the same policies. It's cool we can agree to disagree. You are entitled to your opinion.I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I'm not claiming Paul exempt, I'm saying Romney is talking minor bs changes. DR Paul is talking major changes way different than Obama and Romney. It doesn't matter though, neither Paul or Romney will get the chance to prove their policies are best anyway IMO.Originally posted by Forever_frost View PostSo, Romney is Obama because in order to see his policies you have to vote him in, but Paul has none because he hasn't been voted in so we can see them. You are aware your argument makes no sense when you're claiming a Paul exemption from your own criticism, right?
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Everyone has the right to vote for whomever they align their political views with. If you thinks it's unrealistic is irrelevant. It's not your choice to decide who people should vote for.Originally posted by Forever_frost View PostRealistic? No, unrealistic isn't voting for Romney who is the actual candidate, unrealistic is writing in someone who didn't even win enough deligates in his home state. THAT'S unrealistic
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I don't recall me saying I was going to force anyone to vote one way or anotherOriginally posted by teal93derp View PostEveryone has the right to vote for whomever they align their political views with. If you thinks it's unrealistic is irrelevant. It's not your choice to decide who people should vote for.I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool
Comment
 
Comment