Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

bush & cheney

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by majorownage View Post
    Instead of doing nothing, we could have used it to build factories, powerplants, dams, railways....ANYTHING is better than burning up not only money, but also physical assets on nothing.
    Fuck roads and all that boring domestic stuff. Shoot stuff, make it rain, and yell 'Merica!!
    Originally posted by Buzzo
    Some dudes jump out of airplanes, I fuck hookers without condoms.

    sigpic

    Comment


    • Outside of post roads, fighting a war is one of the few things the federal government is authorized to spend on
      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

      Comment


      • Originally posted by crapstang View Post
        Fuck roads and all that boring domestic stuff. Shoot stuff, make it rain, and yell 'Merica!!
        I wake up every morning, walk out my tent and kick rocks at the Afghans walking by picking up the trash while yelling 'Merica!!!!
        Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Denny View Post
          Ask those poor Syrians getting gassed if Iraq wasn't a threat.
          ... or the Kurds after the first US invasion. I know many of them who now live here who lost family from that attack and praise the 2nd US invasion as great success.

          Comment


          • I am just gonna set this here and ease back quiet and slowly

            Originally posted by Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction

            "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
            --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

            "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
            --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

            "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
            --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

            "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
            --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

            "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
            Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
            -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

            "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
            -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

            "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
            -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

            "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
            Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
            -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

            "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
            -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

            "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
            -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

            "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
            -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

            "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
            -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

            "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
            -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

            "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
            -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

            "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
            -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

            "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
            -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

            "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
            -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

            "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
            -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

            "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
            -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
            Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Craizie View Post
              It created a shit load of jobs.
              The federal government could create a shitload of jobs by having people haul sand back and forth between two sand pits. That isn't beneficial. Jobs for job's sake is pointless.

              Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
              Where do you find the authority for the federal government to do these things?
              I'm not saying I would agree with the government spending 2 trillion on domestic projects, I am just saying it would have been much more beneficial. We lost tangible, physical assets playing team america world police. Ideally we should have never spent it in the first place, but trying to say that fighting a war somehow benefited us is ludacris.
              Full time ninja editor.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by majorownage View Post
                That isn't beneficial. Jobs for job's sake is pointless.
                Originally posted by Buzzo
                Some dudes jump out of airplanes, I fuck hookers without condoms.

                sigpic

                Comment


                • Originally posted by majorownage View Post

                  I'm not saying I would agree with the government spending 2 trillion on domestic projects, I am just saying it would have been much more beneficial. We lost tangible, physical assets playing team america world police. Ideally we should have never spent it in the first place, but trying to say that fighting a war somehow benefited us is ludacris.
                  And your 19 years of grade school experience lead you to that conclusion?
                  Originally posted by BradM
                  But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                  Originally posted by Leah
                  In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                  Comment


                  • I find it funny how it is all blamed on Bush, while every lib forgets how Clinton and every major Democrat that was in office at the time RANTED to finish the war in Iraq. Clinton, Reid, Pelosi, all of them. Long before Bush was elected. And yes, I said finish, I guess all of you young-uns didn't read about how we maintained a no-fly zone over half of the country for over ten years? We were already there, we just didn't have many boots on the ground until 2003.

                    Stevo
                    Originally posted by SSMAN
                    ...Welcome to the land of "Fuck it". No body cares, and if they do, no body cares.

                    Comment


                    • so we are still living in 1988 or is it 2013?
                      THE BAD HOMBRE

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                        And your 19 years of grade school experience lead you to that conclusion?
                        Common sense. It doesn't matter that I'll have a degrees in economics, math, and engineering in May.
                        Full time ninja editor.

                        Comment


                        • The Top Information post: http://topinfopost.com/Documentary 2013 - Panorama: On the eve of the tenth anniversary of the Iraq War, Panorama reveals how key a...

                          Just to through it out there.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by cyclonescott View Post
                            how far you gonna through it?
                            THE BAD HOMBRE

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by naynay View Post
                              how far you gonna through it?
                              The average Is about 6 in.

                              Comment


                              • about 9 where i come from
                                THE BAD HOMBRE

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X