..

Originally posted by sc281 View Post
Txred:

This isn't a Theocracy. Your religion is not law here. Deal with it.

Racr:

Those are his beliefs. Your militant atheism is a religion in and of itself. Can he prove a God exists? No. Can you prove God doesn't exist? No.


Seriously, so much energy fighting over something unproveable. You are two sides of the same coin, thumping your own respective "books"

But nooo, let's got through the same circular B.S..... again. I'm sure it'll be different this time.

Originally posted by racrguy View Post
Who said that I believe god doesn't exist? I sure as fuck didn't. Also, you brought religion into this, nobody else did.

You should also learn what a religion is, and what it is not.

Originally posted by sc281 View Post
1st Bold:
Fair enough. After going through some of your past posts, I don't see where that was said. Maybe I should have been more specific in mentioning the Christian God or the bible, as the Christians regard that book as the word of God.

But can you fault me for coming to the conclusion when the plurality of your posts follow this line of thought?

Originally posted by racrguy View Post
Apparently not so common if you've got your god goggles on.

If you do believe in a God, or no God at all, then why is it so hard for you to accept someone else's belief?

How does your belief in a god (as inferred in your reply) not conflict with statements like this?

Originally posted by racrguy View Post
Ceyko, I place no faith in science. I hold religion to the same standards I hold science to. You make a claim, you'd better have proof.

2nd bold:
Please enlighten me. I'm not being facetious. I would really like to know your views, beliefs if you will; and how your beliefs are any more realistic or unrealistic than Txredneck's.