Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does Ted Cruz not understand Net Neutrality?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CWO
    replied
    Dicks fuck pussies, but they also fuck assholes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    Originally posted by Strychnine View Post
    Today
    This shows a flaw in pure free-market. When the government and the corporations act like cunts, the consumers get fucked.

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    What is being traded? Are states taxing each other's internet as it comes into their state? If not, the document states it's a 10th amendment issue. If you wish the federal government to have jurisdiction, please call an Article 5.
    Money, goods, and services are being traded across state lines.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by YALE View Post
    How is it not regulating trade among states? Again, if you don't like what they're doing, lobby your rep, or file a lawsuit. If it flies, it flies. My money is on it getting thrown out.
    What is being traded? Are states taxing each other's internet as it comes into their state? If not, the document states it's a 10th amendment issue. If you wish the federal government to have jurisdiction, please call an Article 5.

    Leave a comment:


  • lowthreeohz
    replied
    Originally posted by Magnus View Post
    Can someone change Frost's name to "The Constitution", or does the board need at least a 2/3's vote to do that?
    I lol'd.

    Leave a comment:


  • 46Tbird
    replied
    Charter has me just above the average Republic of Moldova-ian, but well below the average Romanian.

    Leave a comment:


  • lowfast
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    The numbers you see in those lists are averages.
    I know. Just wanted to scoreboard some Romanians.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by lowfast View Post
    My Fios hits 84mbps, kick'n Romanias ass!
    The numbers you see in those lists are averages.

    Leave a comment:


  • lowfast
    replied
    My Fios hits 84mbps, kick'n Romanias ass!

    Leave a comment:


  • CexMashean
    replied
    Can someone change Frost's name to "The Constitution", or does the board need at least a 2/3's vote to do that?

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    Is this regulating trade among the several states? If it's not, it falls under the 10th amendment. The federal government has no authority.
    How is it not regulating trade among states? Again, if you don't like what they're doing, lobby your rep, or file a lawsuit. If it flies, it flies. My money is on it getting thrown out.

    Leave a comment:


  • John -- '02 HAWK
    replied
    Originally posted by Strychnine View Post
    Today
    Now is when Magnus should post the speed chart

    Also sounds like a monopoly needs to broken up again

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by YALE View Post
    It is amazingly simple. It reads, "among the several states." It doesn't say, "prohibits states from taxing each other." That has more to do with the General Usage Clause of Article I. It doesn't say, "can't regulate the internet."
    Is this regulating trade among the several states? If it's not, it falls under the 10th amendment. The federal government has no authority.

    Leave a comment:


  • Strychnine
    replied
    Today

    - AT&T Inc on Wednesday raised pressure on the U.S. telecom regulator's work on new "net neutrality" rules, saying it would stop investing in new high-speed Internet connections in 100 U.S. cities until the Web traffic rules are settled.

    We can't go out and invest that kind of money deploying fiber to 100 cities not knowing under what rules those investments will be governed," Stephenson [at&t ceo] said at an analyst conference.

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    It was written so that even the farmers of the day could understand it. It is in English and simple. It doesn't need or permit interpretation.
    It is amazingly simple. It reads, "among the several states." It doesn't say, "prohibits states from taxing each other." That has more to do with the General Usage Clause of Article I. It doesn't say, "can't regulate the internet."

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X