SCOTUS Rules Same Sex Marriage is legal

[dcs13]

And BAM, there ya go. Two gays suing a church because they won't host their wedding.. Tis is in the UK, but will be here soon enough. This is just wrong.

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/millionaire-gay-couple-suing-force-church-hold-wedding/

[SS Junk]

Yeah. I'm calling a christian a bigot. Look up the definition. It fits. I guess I wouldalso be a bigot though. Although I don't try and force my beliefs upon other people. Just discuss my side of the argument.

Some Christians do, some don't. Anyone stating all Christians force their beliefs on you is ignorant. With your line of thinking everyone in existence is a bigot, kind of like how popular it is these days to call people racists if they do not agree with a certain line of thinking or action.

[SS Junk]

There is no one more bigoted against ideas, more embracing of stereotypes and with more double standards than the modern American liberal.

[jdgregory84]

Two way street. Your calling a Christian a "bigot" because they do not support gay marriage is a perfect example. The chic-fil-a debacle is another.
Can I get a spot, breh?

Yeah. I'm calling a christian a bigot. Look up the definition. It fits. I guess I wouldalso be a bigot though. Although I don't try and force my beliefs upon other people. Just discuss my side of the argument.

[Broncojohnny]

Haven't worked in a gym in nearly three years big guy. You also failed to answer my question of what rights you've lost this week and stoop to insults because you can't find any evidence of worth to base your side of the issue on. Good job dude. At least we all know a little more about you now.

Oh I failed to notice the success you have obviously made of yourself. I wonder why?

Are you now criticizing me for being insulting after you started down that path? Sounds about right for you, now cry wolf bitch. You just illustrate what is wrong with this country today. There is no one more bigoted against ideas, more embracing of stereotypes and with more double standards than the modern American liberal.

[SS Junk]

In all honesty though, I'm not angry. I just don't get why if something doesn't go somebodies way, that person then thinks that they're being attacked. Everybody has gotten so defensive over the past decade it seems.

Two way street. Your calling a Christian a "bigot" because they do not support gay marriage is a perfect example. The chic-fil-a debacle is another.
Can I get a spot, breh?

[Craizie]

Haven't worked in a gym in nearly three years big guy. You also failed to answer my question of what rights you've lost this week and stoop to insults because you can't find any evidence of worth to base your side of the issue on. Good job dude. At least we all know a little more about you now.

Workout fag boy!

[jdgregory84]

Nevermind, you ARE only qualified to work at a gym. Thank you for not keeping us in suspense on that question.

As for "things not going my way". I'm curious how that is when I am fully in favor of gay marriage?

*mic drop*

Make sure and clean the ball sweat off the seat of that shoulder press machine, bro

Haven't worked in a gym in nearly three years big guy. You also failed to answer my question of what rights you've lost this week and stoop to insults because you can't find any evidence of worth to base your side of the issue on. Good job dude. At least we all know a little more about you now.

[Broncojohnny]

His job is to not give his own opinion on matters.

Nevermind, you ARE only qualified to work at a gym. Thank you for not keeping us in suspense on that question.

As for "things not going my way". I'm curious how that is when I am fully in favor of gay marriage?

*mic drop*

Make sure and clean the ball sweat off the seat of that shoulder press machine, bro

[Forever_frost]

It's in the first amendment. "Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion."

Right, if it's not congress, it's not a violation. Plain language of the document. Like I said, states and cities could do their own religions as they did on the founding. You had cities that were specific faiths that were pretty much institutionalized. Still, there is no freedom FROM religion, Congress just can't make a Federal Church and make you worship.

Read the writings of the founders and the simple words on parchment.

[jdgregory84]

He's just angry you haven't answered his proposal yet.

Even the guy in front of me at chipotle said no. It's harder to have a same sex marriage than you'd think.

In all honesty though, I'm not angry. I just don't get why if something doesn't go somebodies way, that person then thinks that they're being attacked. Everybody has gotten so defensive over the past decade it seems.

Here's a good Q&A on how Gay Marriages will affect heterosexuals in the future.

http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/a-30-second-guide-to-how-gay-marriage-ruling-affects-you/

[71chevellejohn]

No, the way in which the court justified its decision is taking away freedom. Scalia makes it pretty plain as to why. Maybe you didn't read it or maybe you really are only qualified to work at a gym, I don't know and really don't care to be honest.

He's just angry you haven't answered his proposal yet.

[jdgregory84]

"He notes that all the justices graduated from Harvard or Yale Law School, eight grew up on the coasts, and that not one is an evangelical Christian or a Protestant, religions that make up significant chunks of the American population."

His only job is to make sure that laws being made are supported by the Constitution of the U.S. Only job. His job is to not give his own opinion on matters.

The first amendment of the constitution clearly states that laws cannot reflect religious views. That would make his statement invalid saying that the judges should take into consideration the views of the nations Christians who's only argument is "The bible(a religious document) defines marriage as being between a man and a woman." According to the Constitution, the bible can't be used to make Americas laws.

Do you even lift bro?

[Ruffdaddy]

Yeah BJ is off his rocker on this one

[jdgregory84]

No, the way in which the court justified its decision is taking away freedom. Scalia makes it pretty plain as to why. Maybe you didn't read it or maybe you really are only qualified to work at a gym, I don't know and really don't care to be honest.

What rights have you lost this week?