final vote tally

[Rick Modena]

So now you threaten me

I didn't see anywhere where he threatened you?

And Talisman, that legendary faggot, will come on here and display his TDS like a rain forest bird doing a mating dance.

Shut the fuck up, moron...

[Craizie]

Enjoy it while it lasts! I've got a lot of free time until the end of next month.

I aint bitchin'.

Talisman must be bored out of his god damned mind!

Enjoy it while it lasts! I've got a lot of free time until the end of next month.

[Craizie]

Talisman must be bored out of his god damned mind!

[dsrtuckteezy]

You’re trying to buy the pot at the poker table with a pair of twos.

[Avery'sDad]

So now you threaten me, use words like gaslighting and promise excruciating detail all while offer ZERO DETAILS. Yah go read the entire thread, you’ve offered ZERO DETAILS! Again list the more than 30 cases that have been lost. Don’t bother listing the ones dismissed for standing because that’s not the same thing.

I gave you a video of testimony made before the Senate that listed over 100k i stances of voter fraud. I challenged you to rebuke or disprove one, you FAILED and again offered ZERO evidence to support your claims.

So you honestly think if you lie loud enough, often enough that I’m going to believe you. You may eventually believe your lies, others may believe them, but you’ve offered ZERO evidence to date.

Just like the Dems everything you accused me of doing, you just did. Russian Collusion, withhold funds from the Ukraine, block Covid relief much?

You should move to SF and change your name to Nancy or Karen.

Threaten you? What? I haven’t offered any evidence yet because you keep misunderstanding me, like when you assumed all the lawsuits I was talking about would have Trump’s name in the title for some inexplicable reason. Me repeatedly clarifying what I’m saying so that you can’t willfully misinterpret what I post is not a lack of evidence. I want you to clearly understand with no room for error what you are denying. And now you’ve once again changed the terms of the evidence with a new stipulation. Now suddenly dismissed lawsuits don’t count, even though you explicitly said they hadn’t been dismissed.

Oh we can get to the case list, but the problem is that it deals with nuance; which isn't something you're gifted at determining. You were actually partially correct in your assertion that there aren't 30 Trump vs cases. But I wasn't talking about his name being on the case, I was talking about lawsuits related to election fraud, filed after the conclusion of the election. Over 30 of which have been dismissed or withdrawn. Now that you hopefully clearly understand what I am talking about, do you still dispute it?

So Trump hasn’t filed 30 cases, but he has somehow lost 30 by your count. And like the fake news you are actually wrong. They haven’t been dismissed. Most of them have just been sent on to other courts. The SC dismissed an emergency relief request today but people like you and the fake news are claiming it’s the whole case. The case was actually docketed and will be heard.

You can’t even get straight what you’re denying. It’s always some excuse with you. Every time I ask for clarification you pull it back a little more and get more vague. As for the rest of your questions, we can get to those when you can get just this one thing right. What you’re attempting to do is overwhelm the debate. You want me answering 15 questions so I’m not focusing on details. Who do you think you're debating here? This is kids stuff dude. You’re trying to buy the pot at the poker table with a pair of twos. We’re going to focus on details and ONE item at a time, because that is already exceeding your limited comprehension, and you keep changing the terms of what has happened.

So again, for the cheap seats, over 30 lawsuits withdrawn, dismissed, or ruled against the plaintiff.

Yes or no?

[Gasser64]

The Democrats, the media, social networks and globalists around the world will come unhinged and chaos will erupt. Bigly.


[emoji1317]

And Talisman, that legendary faggot, will come on here and display his TDS like a rain forest bird doing a mating dance.

You know what would be funny? If Trump meddled with those votes. Let the dems spend all their money on rigging the election. And then all he has to rig is one sealed envelope. ROFL!!

Oh he should do it. Fraud the fraudsters.

[AnthonyS]

What I was doing was going into excruciating detail making sure you understood what I was saying and giving you an opportunity to unfuck yourself before I shoved them down your throat.

Then you come back and your first sentence is literally repeating a lie based on a willful misunderstanding of my statements. Do you think anyone respects this asinine method of debate you engage in? You're fucking terrible at gaslighting. This is a forum. Everything that has been said can be looked back on. So why keep on lying? It just makes you look like an idiot. Additionally, if your assertions had any merit, it wouldn't be necessary for you to lie. You weaken your own stances with this behavior.

By the way, the number has now far exceeded 30. But lets go back to that. Is it still your contention that there have not been 30 lawsuits filed since the election alleging fraud or other election based misconduct that have been withdrawn, dismissed, or ruled on against the plaintiff? Think about it for a minute before you answer. Hell, get on google for once in your miserable life. I'm trying to help you here. This is not the time to double down. Admitting you're wrong will not inflict physical pain on you, I promise.

So now you threaten me, use words like gaslighting and promise excruciating detail all while offer ZERO DETAILS. Yah go read the entire thread, you’ve offered ZERO DETAILS! Again list the more than 30 cases that have been lost. Don’t bother listing the ones dismissed for standing because that’s not the same thing.

I gave you a video of testimony made before the Senate that listed over 100k i stances of voter fraud. I challenged you to rebuke or disprove one, you FAILED and again offered ZERO evidence to support your claims.

So you honestly think if you lie loud enough, often enough that I’m going to believe you. You may eventually believe your lies, others may believe them, but you’ve offered ZERO evidence to date.

Just like the Dems everything you accused me of doing, you just did. Russian Collusion, withhold funds from the Ukraine, block Covid relief much?

You should move to SF and change your name to Nancy or Karen.

[Broncojohnny]

IMO, at minimum, Trump's campaign should have flooded the system with their own mail in ballots to ensure that all ballots would have to be verified before being included in the vote totals.

This will be next time. As soon as Republicans figure out that they need to cheat to have a chance then this will start. It is one of the side effects of the Supreme Court saying Texas lacks standing. The court is saying that Texas has no right to sue and by extension, neither does any other state. This whole thing devolves into sham elections.

I didn’t clam up, and you never listed any Ls as in ZERO! I’m just not willing to waste time with someone that cannot understand the Grand Canyon sized difference between dismissing cases for “standing” and actually refuting the claims within the case. If you were actually following this topic you would know that ZERO affidavits and ZERO evidence has been refuted to date. It’s all just been ignored, just like you want to do. This was actually a big part if the Senate hearings yesterday.

The courts and gov’t officials involved are too scared to investigate this just like you are.

What I was doing was going into excruciating detail making sure you understood what I was saying and giving you an opportunity to unfuck yourself before I shoved them down your throat.

Then you come back and your first sentence is literally repeating a lie based on a willful misunderstanding of my statements. Do you think anyone respects this asinine method of debate you engage in? You're fucking terrible at gaslighting. This is a forum. Everything that has been said can be looked back on. So why keep on lying? It just makes you look like an idiot. Additionally, if your assertions had any merit, it wouldn't be necessary for you to lie. You weaken your own stances with this behavior.

By the way, the number has now far exceeded 30. But lets go back to that. Is it still your contention that there have not been 30 lawsuits filed since the election alleging fraud or other election based misconduct that have been withdrawn, dismissed, or ruled on against the plaintiff? Think about it for a minute before you answer. Hell, get on google for once in your miserable life. I'm trying to help you here. This is not the time to double down. Admitting you're wrong will not inflict physical pain on you, I promise.

[AnthonyS]

I've never said otherwise, chinchilla taint. Can you read? I notice you've finally clammed up about those 30 L's. Finally went and actually researched something for once, eh?

Here you go: Refute 1 single solitary instance of fraud presented by this man in the Senate yesterday. There are 10s of thousands to pick from. Then ask yourself why all the courts are using “standing” so none of this can be argued under oath.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/goHz1uEhbsDs/

“Our evidence has never been refuted, only ignored.”. Sounds just like you.

Then ask why isn’t this on TV all day every day like Iran-Contra or OJ?

If you can do that, I will admit you are right and everyone else is wrong (which I will never have to do, by the way).

[AnthonyS]

I've never said otherwise, chinchilla taint. Can you read? I notice you've finally clammed up about those 30 L's. Finally went and actually researched something for once, eh?

I didn’t clam up, and you never listed any Ls as in ZERO! I’m just not willing to waste time with someone that cannot understand the Grand Canyon sized difference between dismissing cases for “standing” and actually refuting the claims within the case. If you were actually following this topic you would know that ZERO affidavits and ZERO evidence has been refuted to date. It’s all just been ignored, just like you want to do. This was actually a big part if the Senate hearings yesterday.

The courts and gov’t officials involved are too scared to investigate this just like you are.

So we admit election fraud is real.

I've never said otherwise, chinchilla taint. Can you read? I notice you've finally clammed up about those 30 L's. Finally went and actually researched something for once, eh?

[mardyn]

The poll workers and others who counted the votes were not really involved in the election scam in my opinion.

The illegitimate votes were injected somewhere up-stream, most likely in the seemingly untraceable/unverifiable mail in vote ballots.

Poll workers were just counting what was placed in front of them... if there wasn't enough to get Biden ahead, more ballots would magically appear.

Trump was dead on correct when he lamented that the mail in ballots were not secure and would ultimately lead to corruption in the election...

the problem is that he or his campaign did nothing to stop it or counter it... except bitch about it on social media outlets.

The GOP certainly wasn't going to do anything, neither was any faction of the US Government or the lapdog media... they all wanted Trump gone so the fleecing of the US Taxpayer could get back on track.

IMO, at minimum, Trump's campaign should have flooded the system with their own mail in ballots to ensure that all ballots would have to be verified before being included in the vote totals.

and btw... it's very likely happening again right now in Georgia for the Senate runoff coming in January...
mardyn