Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Self defense or murder?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 03trubluGT
    replied
    Demographics of jury?

    Leave a comment:


  • Saleen781
    replied
    shoot the jury..teach them a lesson. J/K

    Leave a comment:


  • momo
    replied
    ^^ good post.


    I'm sure the jury was specifically asked to focus on the technical act if it was murder or not and to not focus on the situation or sentence.

    Murder - Noun:The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
    Verb:Kill (someone) unlawfully and with premeditation.
    With this definition I find him not guilty. It was not premeditated and it was not unlawful.

    Leave a comment:


  • ceyko
    replied
    I only watched the video until 2:20, but that should be enough I'd think. I did not watch the rest so my opinion would be swayed.

    1. The 16 "kid" pulled a gun and pointed at someone with the intent to use it for a crime. My personal opinion is that he had it coming.

    2. The second set of 5 shots were not called for *from what I can see on the video*, however - I can't see it being "murder" given the circumstances.

    3. How is it when someone pulls a gun on you, to commit a crime and you kill them - you go to jail for life? I see "46 seconds" mentioned a lot there, and I can see how in that situation 46 seconds may seem like 5.

    4. I feel if I pulled a gun on anyone, anything that happens is my fault - specifically when doing so as a criminal!

    5. Why is the family so happy the man got a life sentence? If that were my kid - I THINK - I'd be extremely sad at the situation as a whole (actually hysterically upset, probably insane). I may even hate the shooter, but as a parent I'd have to realize that *I* failed my child for getting shot for being an idiot at 16.

    Either way, I think the justice system made a mistake this day. Remember, he came in there with a fucking GUN - not a baseball bat. That man went into the standard fight/flight mode and chose to fight and won.

    I understand the technicalities that are being pointed out, but murder?

    Leave a comment:


  • SS Junk
    replied
    Originally posted by Mustangman_2000 View Post
    Sad, but the was a moron. You do not shoot a fleeing suspect no matter how upset or frightened you are. You will go to prison. This guy should have taken a CHL class. A little bit of education would have gone a long way for this guy.

    What video are you watching? He didn't shoot a fleeing suspect. Dude shot was still in the store.

    Leave a comment:


  • LS1Goat
    replied
    Sad, but the was a moron. You do not shoot a fleeing suspect no matter how upset or frightened you are. You will go to prison. This guy should have taken a CHL class. A little bit of education would have gone a long way for this guy.

    Leave a comment:


  • GhostTX
    replied
    Originally posted by jluv View Post
    At the end of the day, he would have never been put in that situation if the punk hadn't have broken the law by participating in armed robbery. It's not like the pharmacist initiated anything or went out and shot an innocent kid.
    Another agreement right here.

    Leave a comment:


  • importassasyn
    replied
    Hero or Executioner?


    Shouldn't all thieves have all their privalleges to breathe stopped? Fuck POS thieves!

    Leave a comment:


  • ALLAN
    replied
    Not guilty.
    World is safer because of his actions.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by Magnus View Post
    The fact that the victim in an armed robbery can be put in prison is fucking embarrassing as a country. Criminals have more rights these days.
    Originally posted by ARIX View Post
    That punk ass kid executed himself when he decided to go into that store with unlawaful intentions. Too bad he did not get the other one.
    Originally posted by momostallion View Post
    i would have never have agreed, it would have been a hung jury.

    it's not murder when it's a real criminal.

    excessive force? yes. murder? no.
    A whole bunch of 'this'.

    Stevo

    Leave a comment:


  • momo
    replied
    i would have never have agreed, it would have been a hung jury.

    it's not murder when it's a real criminal.

    excessive force? yes. murder? no.

    Leave a comment:


  • jnobles06
    replied
    Originally posted by Fst86gt View Post
    What if the kid was already dead? Is there a law against shooting dead people?
    this

    there is no way to prove the kid was still alive or dead after the first shot to the head. the guy might have said he saw him moving but it was probably just nerves. not many people survive a gun shot to the face.

    the jury is in the wrong here for assuming the robber was still alive after he was shot in the head. there is no way to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeremycg777
    replied
    Originally posted by Magnus View Post
    Of course they were illegal, but i really don't see the problem with removing scum from the world, and not making the taxpayers pay to support said scum.

    A few laws apparently need to be reviewed and changed. It should be a law that you forfeit your life when you rob someone at gunpoint.
    Aaahhahaha you quote me Ha I was having a bad day o well. On topic well the guy was justified in the first shot but the extra 5 later was a little out of control. Kill or be killed. society has become pussyfied.He put down a low life that's all I don't care if he's someones kid just be glad it wasnt the other way around. Self defense all the way
    Last edited by Jeremycg777; 06-05-2011, 01:06 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SS Junk
    replied
    Originally posted by brandon01rt View Post
    He should be charged with mutilating a corpse.
    Exactly. If there are technicalities involved in this case then how can you charge him with murder when the suspect was already dead?

    Oh, and that stupid reporter bitch needs to be slapped with a bunch of limp dick.
    Last edited by SS Junk; 06-04-2011, 07:05 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • brandon01rt
    replied
    He should be charged with mutilating a corpse.
    He shot a brotha in the head... He didnt think the threat was over?
    BOOM HEADSHOT

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X