Self defense or murder?

[Snatch Napkin]

He shouldn't have shot him five more times.


However, he also looks a few bricks shy of a load in the stress department.

I'm betting he was acting accordingly with what he felt the situation needed. I don't believe he should be imprisoned.

[Fst86gt]

What if the kid was already dead? Is there a law against shooting dead people?

[JC316]

Understandable about the first shot. But going back 46 seconds later and putting 5 more into a guy with no gun is where it's gets to be a complicated matter.

My view as well. I call that an execution, not self defense. Had he killed the kid with one shot, self defense, only wounding him and then executing him, then it's murder.

[JP135]

I see the argument for not guilty. But legally, I understand the jury's view - the immediate threat was eliminated after the first shot (or volley of shots). At the point where the citizen chased after the second suspect, he extended himself beyond just defending himself and innocent third parties and got into chase/aprehend mode. After he gave chase, he returned and popped the kid five times. If the kid was so much of a threat, why did the guy chose to disengage, chase suspect number 2, then return? If suspect number 1 was still enough of a threat to require being shot five more times, the guy should've stayed and covered him instead of chasing number 2.

Also, self defense doctrine is "shoot to stop". Once the suspect has gone down, you may not be justified in shooting him additional times.

Why did the citizen need two guns? Was he some kind of wanna-be Dirty Harry? Juries take a hard look at intent. Is it normal for a CHL holder to carry two guns or was this guy looking for a chance to kill somebody?

I don't agree with a life sentence.

[Pro88LX]

should have just kept shooting the first time.

[Steve]

I understand that, but when your in a situation where you facing two guys and you see a gun, you are gonna act on instinct and try to get both of them. Just close your eyes and put yourself in that guys shoes. He had all those women around him and didn't want any innocent people getting hurt.

Understandable about the first shot. But going back 46 seconds later and putting 5 more into a guy with no gun is where it's gets to be a complicated matter.

[Blakeski]

The one who was shot didn't have the gun.

I understand that, but when your in a situation where you facing two guys and you see a gun, you are gonna act on instinct and try to get both of them. Just close your eyes and put yourself in that guys shoes. He had all those women around him and didn't want any innocent people getting hurt.

[D. Lil]

He would have been within his legal rights to kill him in the first place, so lets give him life in prison for doing a proper dead check?

[Steve]

Self defense, the guy was moving so he made sure he didn't try to shoot first! Now the extra shots, maybe a little bit excessive.

The one who was shot didn't have the gun.

[Blakeski]

Self defense, the guy was moving so he made sure he didn't try to shoot first! Now the extra shots, maybe a little bit excessive.

[silverhatch]

Self defense.

[Steve]

Discuss.