Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game of Thrones
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by momo View Postsaw this:
"The sequence took three grueling days to shoot, and while Headey might not have been naked herself during all the shots (a body double was used)"
Lena Headey has a no nudity clause in her contract. Only her, Maisie Williams, and Sophie Turner have this clause.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by YALE View PostHe may just be Jon. The dude from the Brotherhood Without Banners was from the same religion as Melisandre. He could be revived whole.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostWell I was completely wrong about the queen. Unless that was CGI. Some nice jugs on her.
"The sequence took three grueling days to shoot, and while Headey might not have been naked herself during all the shots (a body double was used)"
Lena Headey has a no nudity clause in her contract. Only her, Maisie Williams, and Sophie Turner have this clause.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostExcellent point. I am not sure all of that will be wasted. I can see Jon ending up leading a wildling army, maybe with sweet tits as his sidekick.
There is no way there is no more Jon Snow in GOT. MAYBE in the show, but no way he is done in the actual story from the books.
I think Jon Snow is the ice part of the fire and ice title. Daenerys being the fire. I think those two characters is really what the main story will ultimately be centered around.
While watching for the second time, it's clearly obvious that Jon Snow is NOT Ned's bastard son, but rather Ned's dead sister's (Liana) child. *if you don't remember her, Liana was Robert's true love he goes to visit in the Winterfell Tombs.
So that part I figured that out the first time watching, I just thought Snow was the true son of Robert Baratheon (thus true heir to the throne after Robert instead of the fake Lanister incest children) as I thought Ned was covering parenthood for a Robert bastard based on Ned's wife giving him shit that the last time he left with Robert he banged some chick and brought home a bastard.
...BUT during the second viewing, I figured no way it's a Robert bastard.
A. it happened before marrying Cersei.
B. why would Ned lie to Robert about it? From a conversation Robert had with Ned, Ned claims Snow was his bastard which took place during the Robert rebellion to overthrow the mad king. (Robert was surprised Ned would have even done that to Caitlyn Stark.)
Well, also occurring during the Robert Rebellion, the mad king's son (Rheygar Targarean) kidnapped Liana. She died when Ned went to save her.
So, I think if that child was Robert's then Ned would have told him. But because Ned lies and says it his own child, the father is likely the man who kidnapped her. Rheygar Targarean.
So that should make Snow the heir to the throne under the Targarean lineage, mad kings son's son. So NOT Danerys. I think that makes her his Aunt, lol. Why else would Jon Snow have "King's Blood" in him?Last edited by momo; 06-16-2015, 10:23 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
I've read some rumors that the incest daughter might not be dead either.
As much as I'd like to see it set Jamie off, I'd rather see Myrcella get them out later on.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm waiting for the faceless men to wake up a zombie dragon, which will melt the wall and allow the white walkers to kill everyone.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by momo View Posteh, just cause they said Jon is dead doesn't mean he doesn't come back as some non-Jon type thing.
If you know who is parents are, I feel like he has an important role in story still.
Leave a comment:
-
Damn it, this show really pisses me off.
oh and that walk was CGIededed a ton.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BLAKE View PostThat all makes sense to me. There sure was a lot of development with the face off against the Night's King for it to just fizzle out.
Leave a comment:
-
That all makes sense to me. There sure was a lot of development with the face off against the Night's King for it to just fizzle out.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: