Netflix Original: Bill Nye Saves The Earth

[SBFORDTECH]

i cant keep on 10 pages later. this topic has shifted so many times.

as i said, trump doesnt give a flying fuck about anything you are talking about.

this is a 70 year old 8 year old who would rather sit in his room alone playing on his phone, than to be an actual world leader. respect is earned, not given.

this is your president with other world leaders, how long til he pulls out of nato?

[Rick Modena]

That's where you're wrong. This thread is great evidence that we are all producing and directing and starring in our own life movies filmed through our own lenses.

How can I argue with that...

[CWO]

I should have known that by the many pages that this wasn't about a movie anymore...

That's where you're wrong. This thread is great evidence that we are all producing and directing and starring in our own life movies filmed through our own lenses.

[Rick Modena]

I should have known that by the many pages that this wasn't about a movie anymore...

[SS Junk]

Read it. From the comments:

Good luck on conquering the opinions of heathen resource hogs with your faith based opinions in hopes of:

... environmental superiority...

[Broncojohnny]

Read it. From the comments:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars...udy-fake-news/

They do lose thousands of dollars on every car they produce though. So in another way it is quite unsustainable.

[mschmoyer]

http://principia-scientific.org/stud...riving-on-gas/

Read it. From the comments:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/news/a27039/tesla-battery-emissions-study-fake-news/

If you're predisposed to hate electric cars, then there's a wonderful story making the rounds that'll support your worldview. It claims that the production of Tesla battery produces carbon emissions equivalent to driving an internal-combustion vehicle for eight years—8.2, to be precise.

That's a sensational claim, one that's been seized upon by EV haters and gleefully posted by climate change-denying blogs and sites that despise electric cars. Just one problem: It's absolute nonsense.

[SS Junk]

http://principia-scientific.org/study-tesla-car-battery-production-releases-as-much-co2-as-8-years-of-driving-on-gas/

[SS Junk]

I wouldn't waste your time talking to SS. If he were arguing with god, he'd be right. There really is no point in discussing anything with him.

LOL.. okay, Smegma Stench. This coming from the multiple personality mental patient with an unfinished DB rack.

Did I not clarify that...just for you? Then you go on the following tirade based on providing you the answer you wanted...

Well, no because there's still a part of the equation missing regarding making a claim of whose footprint is smaller.

Am I to understand that because I provided some math to calculate c02 emissions, you jump all the way to me saying "all climate change is caused by c02"?

LOL.. wow. We were talking about carbon footprint and you only bring up C02 for a comparison between you and I. Hence, the reason for the question as to why that is the only issue you bring up. You may not have said it, but your kind love to lecture the resource heathens who consume guilt free. As stated, you all are everywhere and if you continue to be this way you aren't going to accomplish jack squat.
"Together we stand. Divided we fall." - Pink Floyd

My shit is straight...

[mschmoyer]

You JUST informed me in your previous post you believe your footprint is smaller than mine even though you have zero idea what either is... and I'm in left field.. lulz

Did I not clarify that...just for you? Then you go on the following tirade based on providing you the answer you wanted...

What? I thought there was more to human pollution than CO2 emissions? But yeah, keep nit picking to try and keep your point relevant. As said earlier, all of your kind need to get your shit straight and become a united front in this battle instead of these ridiculous, varying opinions on what is and what is not good for our environment.

Am I to understand that because I provided some math to calculate c02 emissions, you jump all the way to me saying "all climate change is caused by c02"?

My shit is straight. Your all over the place.

Edit: Gasser64 - Yup, it's fruitless I know. He gets a few replies, then I'll ignore and let others continue the discussion.

[Gasser64]

Still out there in left field buddy. My only arguments have been about the science of man-made climate change and ways to fix it. Nobody has mentioned "colossal resource users"? That's your own invention.

I have an exact figure of $$$ spent on gas this year. I can calculate the gallons used if I had to. Google c02 released per gallon. Basic stuff...not hard.

I wouldn't waste your time talking to SS. If he were arguing with god, he'd be right. There really is no point in discussing anything with him.

[SS Junk]

Still out there in left field buddy. My only arguments have been about the science of man-made climate change and ways to fix it. Nobody has mentioned "colossal resource users"? That's your own invention.

You JUST informed me in your previous post you believe your footprint is smaller than mine even though you have zero idea what either is... and I'm in left field.. lulz

I have an exact figure of $$$ spent on gas this year. I can calculate the gallons used if I had to. Google c02 released per gallon. Basic stuff...not hard.

What? I thought there was more to human pollution than CO2 emissions? But yeah, keep nit picking to try and keep your point relevant. As said earlier, all of your kind need to get your shit straight and become a united front in this battle instead of these ridiculous, varying opinions on what is and what is not good for our environment.

[mschmoyer]

This is not trolling. These are serious questions because of how you've portrayed yourself on this subject. Example- You have no idea what your carbon footprint is, but you are by golly sure it's smaller than mine. That's science right there! LOL!!!
You really can't blame anyone yet because you have no basis or evidence to blame anyone. What I'm saying is when your agenda fails to show what you and your kind have been parroting you will then blame we colossal resource users.

Still out there in left field buddy. My only arguments have been about the science of man-made climate change and ways to fix it. Nobody has mentioned "colossal resource users"? That's your own invention.

I have an exact figure of $$$ spent on gas this year. I can calculate the gallons used if I had to. Google c02 released per gallon. Basic stuff...not hard.

[SS Junk]

Obvious troll post but oh well. You don't know how much my carbon footprint is, but I'm sure it's much less than yours, if we're counting. I didn't blame anyone, I've only said there is evidence of human caused climate change.

This is not trolling. These are serious questions because of how you've portrayed yourself on this subject. Example- You have no idea what your carbon footprint is, but you are by golly sure it's smaller than mine. That's science right there! LOL!!!
You really can't blame anyone yet because you have no basis or evidence to blame anyone. What I'm saying is when your agenda fails to show what you and your kind have been parroting you will then blame we colossal resource users.

[mschmoyer]

Do you and your other large carbon footprint buddies all agree that preserving earth resources will do no good, so you are all going to sit there with your thumbs up your asses and tell everyone to vote while you keep polluting the earth waiting for a dependable and affordable electric car? And when things don't go your way, instead of taking any sort of accountability you'll blame it on us resource hogs?

Obvious troll post but oh well. You don't know how much my carbon footprint is, but I'm sure it's much less than yours, if we're counting. I didn't blame anyone, I've only said there is evidence of human caused climate change.

CWO - We will yes, until some problem comes along that is too difficult for traditional civilization "status quo" innovation to solve. Another example -- USA going to the moon. We weren't going to do that successfully unless we actively funded it.