So, just out of curiosity, how many of you guys who are already saying FTP or that this will be abused have actually had your door kicked in by the Po-Po?
So, just out of curiosity, how many of you guys who are already saying FTP or that this will be abused have actually had your door kicked in by the Po-Po?
In the case given in the original article, do you think the cops were in the right?
Following somebody for selling crack and, in their confusion, kicking in the door of somebody else who happened to be smoking pot. (The pound of coke is a lucky bi-product of their error.)
hear sounds suggesting evidence is being destroyed
"Destruction of evidence issues probably occur most frequently in drug cases because drugs may be easily destroyed by flushing down a toilet," he added.
better hope you aren't on the shitter when they knock loudly b/c you are destroying evidence.
So, just out of curiosity, how many of you guys who are already saying FTP or that this will be abused have actually had your door kicked in by the Po-Po?
So, just out of curiosity, how many of you guys who are already saying FTP or that this will be abused have actually had your door kicked in by the Po-Po?
What a fucking joke. I see this being HEAVILY abused.
Yep, the will be the equivalent of probable cause in cars. Whether they yell police or not won't matter. If they force their way into my house, they're gettin shot in the head.
This is different, bro. It states basically that you cannot resist during lawful or unlawful entries by the police. That shit doesn't fly with anyone. We're talking no magistrates signing off or incidents without PC as well. That's the problem.
Edit: Disreagrd. I thought this was the OTHER forced entry by LEO thread for the State.
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_ec169697-a19e-525f-a532-81b3df229697.html
NDIANAPOLIS | Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.
First they
Yesterday the Court issued a decision in Kentucky v. King that was noteworthy not only for its holding, but also for the method that the Court used to arrive at its rule.
Um guys, this is old news... An Officer is allowed to enter a residence by force during exigent circumstances. I.E. Screams from the residence, someone getting there rear beat, evidence being destroyed ("Oh shit! Flush the crack! Flush the Crack!"), etc.
I learned this in the Academy back in 2006... So dont worry about this being something newand abused. Its been done in TX for a long while.
This is different, bro. It states basically that you cannot resist during lawful or unlawful entries by the police. That shit doesn't fly with anyone. We're talking no magistrates signing off or incidents without PC as well. That's the problem.
Edit: Disreagrd. I thought this was the OTHER forced entry by LEO thread for the State.
Um guys, this is old news... An Officer is allowed to enter a residence by force during exigent circumstances. I.E. Screams from the residence, someone getting there rear beat, evidence being destroyed ("Oh shit! Flush the crack! Flush the Crack!"), etc.
I learned this in the Academy back in 2006... So dont worry about this being something newand abused. Its been done in TX for a long while.
They haven't been able to kick down the door to the wrong residence, lie about "hearing some noises" to cover up the mistake and admit what they found as evidence of a crime until now.
Um guys, this is old news... An Officer is allowed to enter a residence by force during exigent circumstances. I.E. Screams from the residence, someone getting there rear beat, evidence being destroyed ("Oh shit! Flush the crack! Flush the Crack!"), etc.
I learned this in the Academy back in 2006... So dont worry about this being something newand abused. Its been done in TX for a long while.
Leave a comment: