Originally posted by Alex
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Help need plate ran! Hit and Run
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bcoop View PostNo, not really. 19 states don't require them. That's a fact. If hit and runs and identification from the front of a vehicle were such an issue in those states, they would require them as well. That's just common sense.
What is an opinion, is your opinion that front plates are necessary in TX due to hit and run accidents and the need to identify a vehicle from the front.
Tell us, Officer Smart Guy. When was the last time you pulled someone over that was driving backwards?
From a LEO standpoint, I would prefer each vehicle to be plated front and back to make readily available identification. There are hit and runs, gas drive offs, robberies, burglaries, assaults (you get the picture, insert offense here) that occur that the plate on both ends may assist in identifying the suspect vehicle.
From a driver of a sports car standpoint, I don't want a front plate on my car.
The last question is stupid.
Leave a comment:
-
Texas: We're better just because we require two plates. And yes, drugs should be made legal.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostDamn Brent, do you have to be so obtuse? There are some drugs that are legal in Europe, should they be made legal here? How would you like some thalidomide?
When was the last time you pulled anyone over at all, tough guy?
That's not opinion. It's fact.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bcoop View PostNo, not really. 19 states don't require them. That's a fact. If hit and runs and identification from the front of a vehicle were such an issue in those states, they would require them as well. That's just common sense.
What is an opinion, is your opinion that front plates are necessary in TX due to hit and run accidents and the need to identify a vehicle from the front.
Tell us, Officer Smart Guy. When was the last time you pulled someone over that was driving backwards?
When was the last time you pulled anyone over at all, tough guy?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bcoop View PostNo, not really. 19 states don't require them. That's a fact. If hit and runs and identification from the front of a vehicle were such an issue in those states, they would require them as well. That's just common sense.
What is an opinion, is your opinion that front plates are necessary in TX due to hit and run accidents and the need to identify a vehicle from the front.
Tell us, Officer Smart Guy. When was the last time you pulled someone over that was driving backwards?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bcoop View PostTell us, Officer Smart Guy. When was the last time you pulled someone over that was driving backwards?
Good thing California has them or this guy might have gotten away
(CBS) - Police in Glendale, Calif. say that on Saturday morning they pulled over a 49-year-old man who was driving 30 mph. In reverse. For three miles.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Geofster View PostI was really hoping for a "look you fucking troll" type of response to him! Or maybe you've given him those ad naseum.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostThat's your opinion.
What is an opinion, is your opinion that front plates are necessary in TX due to hit and run accidents and the need to identify a vehicle from the front.
Tell us, Officer Smart Guy. When was the last time you pulled someone over that was driving backwards?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bcoop View PostYour whole accident and identification scenario doesn't hold water though, when you consider the other states that don't require them. So, you still have yet to have a solid plausible point on why they are required.
I say this, to say that his opinion as to why they are required is no less laughable than yours.
That's your opinion.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: