Gay rights... who are we to judge?

[talisman]

Fuck that shit! But now you can marry your bros!

Are you trying to get a tax break with me, sweetheart?

[46Tbird]

Are you trying to get a tax break with me, sweetheart?

YOU can marry YOUR bros. We ain't bros, bro.

[talisman]

That's not what you said when you bought my dinner last night you teasing trollop.

[Ratt]

That's not what you said when you bought my dinner last night you teasing trollop.

+1 for trollop.

[slow06]

Being married to 4 women at once sounds like a horror movie I'd never want to watch.

Multiple tax breaks for putting up with multiple women?

[talisman]

Multiple tax breaks for putting up with multiple women?

I'll write Uncle Sam a check with a smile on my face.

[bcoop]

Brent loves the cock!

Says the dude who has seen more up close and personal than I ever have, or ever will.


Who fucking cares about polygamy? I sure as shit don't. What people do in their bedroom doesn't bother me a single bit.


"But, but, but God says.." No, he doesn't/didn't. God is as fictional as Spiderman.

[8mpg]

Man.. I posted this right before I went to bed. I woke up expecting a bunch of bible thumping ignorant replies but find many people who share my opinion.

The polygamy thing is a very valid concern as well as Keith's old uncle marrying niece. These again are based off of morality and we can look back through history where both of these were once common. Our morality has shifted and now does not allow these. I agree this is a very slippery slope.

[Pro88LX]

So, it's cool for all of the heterosexual businesses to do it, just not homosexual ones. There's no hypocrisy there.

there are businesses that advetize as hetero only businesses?

[bcoop]

The polygamy thing is a very valid concern

Why?

as well as Keith's old uncle marrying niece.

Why?


Why should government have a say over any of it? I don't give a fuck if you want to have 22 kids with your sister and all 7 of her best friends, as long as she's a consenting adult.

[JC316]

I am not going to read the whole thread because I already know what the generic responses are going to be. Just gonna put in my .02.

I don't really give a rats ass if gays marry or not, it's their life, the government shouldn't have any say in it. I would be a hypocrite if in one breath I say that the government shouldn't tell me what types of guns I can own, or what size soft drink I can have, but in another breath, I say that gay marriage should be banned.

I don't like it, but it shouldn't be banned. The absolute only problem that I have with gays is the same problem that I have with organized religion, the ones that want to flaunt it and make you accept it. It's your life, keep it that way, you don't need a holiday, you don't have to have parades, you don't have to act like a total fucking doucebag in public just because you can.

[8mpg]

Why?



Why?


Why should government have a say over any of it? I don't give a fuck if you want to have 22 kids with your sister and all 7 of her best friends, as long as she's a consenting adult.

Brent.. Im very libertarian and I agree. Polygamy doesnt bother me really but the uncle marrying niece does. The incestuous relationship is a problem and can lead to inbreeding problems.

[46Tbird]

Man.. I posted this right before I went to bed. I woke up expecting a bunch of bible thumping ignorant replies but find many people who share my opinion.

The polygamy thing is a very valid concern as well as Keith's old uncle marrying niece. These again are based off of morality and we can look back through history where both of these were once common. Our morality has shifted and now does not allow these. I agree this is a very slippery slope.

The prophet Muhammad married a wife (one of many) when she was six and first consumated the marriage when she was nine. Slippery slope indeed.

[talisman]

I'm surprised Denny isn't Muslim.

[bcoop]

The incestuous relationship is a problem and can lead to inbreeding problems.

That's really the only reason I can think of, health issues. But I don't really think it's the Fed's right to say anything about it at all. They can't really force sterilization in those situations. I think if anything it should be left to the State level. Marriage isn't mentioned anywhere in the Constitution, or Bill of Rights. Which is exactly why I can't understand why the Federal Govt has any say in the matter at all. If it were at least left to the States, all the homosexuals could go to MA, MD, and CA. And all the sister fuckers can migrate to Arkansas. That way it's not outright banned, they still have refuge somewhere in the US.