Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Missing 777

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ftp View Post
    93 was shot down but the gubment will never admit that. They will however make a propaganda movie about it with some feel good story line though to convince us otherwise. And actually, there's a clip of Rumsfeld speaking somewhere where he slips up and says it was shot down. The video is on YouTube.

    The media keeps talking about where this missing 777 could be. The media has mentioned practically every place on earth the plane could be, except the one place that the plane could definitely reach, and that's Diego Garcia. The plane was in reach of Diego Garcia when transponder was disabled. Of course that would implicate some nefarious act by our government, hence the silence in the media of Diego Garcia being a possible landing spot.

    I dont put anything out the realm of possibility when we have a government who has shipped guns to Mexico intentionally to demonize the 2nd amendment and countless other treasonous acts. This whole thing stinks, and IMO is no accident.

    LOL ----

    Comment


    • Comment




      • Comment


        • Originally posted by ftp View Post
          93 was shot down but the gubment will never admit that. They will however make a propaganda movie about it with some feel good story line though to convince us otherwise. And actually, there's a clip of Rumsfeld speaking somewhere where he slips up and says it was shot down. The video is on YouTube.

          The media keeps talking about where this missing 777 could be. The media has mentioned practically every place on earth the plane could be, except the one place that the plane could definitely reach, and that's Diego Garcia. The plane was in reach of Diego Garcia when transponder was disabled. Of course that would implicate some nefarious act by our government, hence the silence in the media of Diego Garcia being a possible landing spot.

          I dont put anything out the realm of possibility when we have a government who has shipped guns to Mexico intentionally to demonize the 2nd amendment and countless other treasonous acts. This whole thing stinks, and IMO is no accident.
          It was nice knowing ya!

          Comment


          • the last radar indication of heading was Sri Lanka

            If Boeing's engine communications would include power levels, it would help
            Don't worry about what you can't change.
            Do the best you can with what you have.
            Be honest, even if it hurts.

            "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

            Comment


            • I thought I read this aircraft was not equipped with acars.

              Comment


              • I didn't realize that we had so many of you on here.


                Comment


                • Most likely, yes, some nation sponsored this because you'd need that level of resources to keep things quiet, such as providing a runway for it to land and keeping a lid on all the passengers, which includes jamming all sort of cell phones, 3g, etc.

                  Why?

                  Simple....given the 777's typical range is pretty high, like 7000-8000nm, as well as its payload capacity, what is a transportation method for a heavy nuke for $1000 Alex.

                  Who?

                  My guesses, possibly NK, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Chuck_Finley View Post
                    Most likely, yes, some nation sponsored this because you'd need that level of resources to keep things quiet, such as providing a runway for it to land and keeping a lid on all the passengers, which includes jamming all sort of cell phones, 3g, etc.

                    Why?

                    Simple....given the 777's typical range is pretty high, like 7000-8000nm, as well as its payload capacity, what is a transportation method for a heavy nuke for $1000 Alex.
                    I though about this yesterday, not the nuke necessarily but for ANY reason why someone would want a 777. No matter what even if someone is hiding it they are going to have to sit on it FOREVER before they can use it. Once they take off and get inside of someones radar range and the thing is not communicating any information its going to be target practice for some country's fighter jets.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by inline 6 View Post
                      I though about this yesterday, not the nuke necessarily but for ANY reason why someone would want a 777. No matter what even if someone is hiding it they are going to have to sit on it FOREVER before they can use it. Once they take off and get inside of someones radar range and the thing is not communicating any information its going to be target practice for some country's fighter jets.
                      I think that's going to be standard procedure for ANY aircraft, not just this one. Of course, yes, once "they" set it on its flight for whatever mission they have in mind in the future, that's it there's no going back.

                      But too, there is also the possibility of dismantling it and making some kind of a replica aircraft for the purposes of gaining a similar range and payload capacity. Try to put them into some kind of service somewhere at some future point then try to accomplish the same goal with nuke delivery after the world in general gets used to seeing them.

                      Who knows, we could go round and round on this one for a while.

                      Also, I forgot to add China to the list in my previous post.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by inline 6 View Post
                        I though about this yesterday, not the nuke necessarily but for ANY reason why someone would want a 777. No matter what even if someone is hiding it they are going to have to sit on it FOREVER before they can use it. Once they take off and get inside of someones radar range and the thing is not communicating any information its going to be target practice for some country's fighter jets.
                        Could they register it as a private 777? Like a shieks...

                        Comment


                        • Just change the tail numbers, that'll fool everyone.

                          Comment


                          • Chinese stole it so they could make a knock off jet...

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by inline 6 View Post
                              Once they take off and get inside of someones radar range and the thing is not communicating any information its going to be target practice for some country's fighter jets.
                              Not communicating? If this is state-sponsored terrorism, that government could just set up a flight for a normal passenger or military aircraft, and haul out this plane to fly it.
                              When the government pays, the government controls.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Shaggin Wagon View Post
                                Chinese stole it so they could make a knock off jet...
                                It wouldn't be the first time.

                                Well, the Russians actually did the stealing and the knock-offs, but China did end up with a few of them.

                                When the government pays, the government controls.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X