Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sooooooo.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Geor! View Post
    All pro-abortionists have never had one. All who have had one have regretted it sooner or later.
    Lol, dude, get outta here. You're smarter than that.

    Leave a comment:


  • EW
    replied
    Ever notice that many/most anti-abortionists are men?

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by stevo View Post
    I believe that the father should be able to make the decision as well as the mother. It takes two people to (naturally) conceive a child, if the mother can decide to kill a child, the father should be able to force her to have one.

    Pro-choice suddenly becomes a real bitch to women when you make it fair to both parents.

    Stevo
    He can't force her to have a medical procedure she doesn't want to have. However, he should be able to divorce himself from the situation. For example: She wants the kid, he doesn't, he should be able to give away any rights he may have to the child and not be on the hook for any financial support, but the decision must be made under the same guidelines as an abortion. Which forces his had to be played before the 23rd week, after that point he's stuck with the repercussions.

    Leave a comment:


  • EW
    replied
    Originally posted by Geor! View Post
    All pro-abortionists have never had one. All who have had one have regretted it sooner or later.
    That is Bullshit. Like anyone could even know that. Plus such a stupid blanket statement. "I was raped and had an abortion. Now I regret it." Yeah right.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by Baron View Post
    and I dont think that is your decision to make.
    I believe that the father should be able to make the decision as well as the mother. It takes two people to (naturally) conceive a child, if the mother can decide to kill a child, the father should be able to force her to have one.

    Pro-choice suddenly becomes a real bitch to women when you make it fair to both parents.

    Stevo

    Leave a comment:


  • Geor!
    replied
    All pro-abortionists have never had one. All who have had one have regretted it sooner or later.

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Magnus View Post
    And how would it achieve those goals?
    By limiting the manner in which patients can receive abortion, and in what setting. Every abortion doesn't need to be surgical.

    Leave a comment:


  • sc281
    replied
    "It's the economy, Stupid."

    This is idiotic as all get out.

    Dems want to legislate your money, Republicans want to legislate your body.

    Leave a comment:


  • Baron Von Crowder
    replied
    Originally posted by Magnus View Post
    How would result in the closing of all buy 5 places?
    What criteria would all of those places not be able to meet?

    I've ignored the bill because i could give a shit less, and also don't think that someone who wasn't raped, may die during birth, child found to be genetically deformed in the womb, or no attempt at any type of conception prevention was used should be allowed to have one anyways.
    and I dont think that is your decision to make.

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Magnus View Post
    How would result in the closing of all buy 5 places?
    What criteria would all of those places not be able to meet?

    I've ignored the bill because i could give a shit less, and also don't think that someone who wasn't raped, may die during birth, child found to be genetically deformed in the womb, or no attempt at any type of conception prevention was used should be allowed to have one anyways.
    Read the thread and it will answer all your questions.

    Leave a comment:


  • CexMashean
    replied
    Originally posted by Treasure Chest View Post
    By completely taking away the access to the procedure. It would limit the surgical procedure to 5 sites statewide. Many "maternal health" abortions are performed surgically.
    How would result in the closing of all buy 5 places?
    What criteria would all of those places not be able to meet?

    I've ignored the bill because i could give a shit less, and also don't think that someone who wasn't raped, may die during birth, child found to be genetically deformed in the womb, or no attempt at any type of conception prevention was used should be allowed to have one anyways.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    Originally posted by Treasure Chest View Post
    By completely taking away the access to the procedure. It would limit the surgical procedure to 5 sites statewide. Many "maternal health" abortions are performed surgically.
    Surgically? By Dr. Martens?

    Leave a comment:


  • Treasure Chest
    replied
    Originally posted by Magnus View Post
    And how would it achieve those goals?
    By completely taking away the access to the procedure. It would limit the surgical procedure to 5 sites statewide. Many "maternal health" abortions are performed surgically.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave586
    replied
    It should be a double edge sword...if we are allowed to kill a baby without giving it a fuck chance to survive - then we should be allowed to kill a fuckup to society without a trial/judge/jury.

    Leave a comment:


  • 46Tbird
    replied
    I completely agree with the "Reps" in this thread.

    I'm not a supporter of abortions, but having the Republicans tied to an anti-abortion stance is a turnoff for me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X