LEO's What were they thinking?

[ceyko]

Is someone getting arrested in relation to peeing in the pool? The comparison is invalid.

As for the context of that post, it is exactly as read, you said it was a legal arrest, but it wasn't right and he shouldn't have done it. The context of those two statements made by you is very cut and dry. Either it was legal and he should have done it, or it was illegal and he shouldn't have done it.

Stevo

I do not see what's so hard about understanding that..

1. The cop was technically allowed to arrest her
2. However, poor judgement was used in that situation and he arrested her

I'm not seeing a disconnect in his statements at all - regardless if I agree or disagree with him.

[stevo]

Just because you can pee in a swimming pool doesn't mean that you should. Here is another example of you taking my post out of context.

Is someone getting arrested in relation to peeing in the pool? The comparison is invalid.

As for the context of that post, it is exactly as read, you said it was a legal arrest, but it wasn't right and he shouldn't have done it. The context of those two statements made by you is very cut and dry. Either it was legal and he should have done it, or it was illegal and he shouldn't have done it.

Stevo

[stangin4lyfe]

The order he gave was legal lol. He didn't as her to go rob a bank. I disagree completely with what the officer did. I would have told her she needed to get back. I do believe she was a little too close for comfort in the begining. But once she stepped back she was fine there.

Sorry, I was making a change to my post and deleted it before you replied.


I agree completely with what you are saying...the arrest should not have been made.

[stangin4lyfe]

The lawful order would have to be legal in the first place.
What does the sidewalk(easement) have to do with the law?
Besides...she obeyed and backed onto to her own property after the officer's orders.
In my eyes, she was not interfering by any means whatsoever.

[Machx2]

The lawful order would have to be legal in the first place.
What does the sidewalk(easement) have to do with the law?
Besides...she obeyed and backed onto to her own property after the officer's orders.
In my eyes, she was not interfering by any means whatsoever.

The order he gave was legal lol. He didn't as her to go rob a bank. I disagree completely with what the officer did. I would have told her she needed to get back. I do believe she was a little too close for comfort in the begining. But once she stepped back she was fine there.

[Machx2]

I don't know you, I just get my information on what you post.



That is your opinion, others may disagree.



Violation of civil liberties?





Okay, which is it, a legal arrest, or it wasn't right and he shouldn't have arrested her? Pick one please.

Yes, I did, since you said "that ruins someones whole life". I used the DPD requirements as an example. Considering the whole education requirement process that DPD needs can be done in three semesters, I am still not sure how it would ruin his whole life.

If police officers and prosecuting attorneys were held responsible, eye for an eye, when they are wrong/crooked, they would strive to be right.

Stevo

Just because you can pee in a swimming pool doesn't mean that you should. Here is another example of you taking my post out of context.

[stevo]

You always take everything I say to heart.

I don't know you, I just get my information on what you post.

It has nothing to do with where I work.

That is your opinion, others may disagree.

What charges are you going to place on him?

Violation of civil liberties?

He made a legal arrest as far as I see it, wasn't right, but it was legal.

HE SHOULD NOT HAVE ARRESTED HER.

Okay, which is it, a legal arrest, or it wasn't right and he shouldn't have arrested her? Pick one please.

Throwing that out there. Btw did you get that off the Dallas police page. Looks like Rochester does not require any. Doesn't mean he doesn't have any college.

Yes, I did, since you said "that ruins someones whole life". I used the DPD requirements as an example. Considering the whole education requirement process that DPD needs can be done in three semesters, I am still not sure how it would ruin his whole life.

If police officers and prosecuting attorneys were held responsible, eye for an eye, when they are wrong/crooked, they would strive to be right.

Stevo

[Machx2]

Another thing. The officer had a horrible attitude from the begining. If he really felt she was a danger he could have just walked up to her and talked to her like a human being.

[Machx2]

but how is it a lawful order if she was legally standing in her yard filming?

That would be a defense she could use. I believe you should be able to do as you please in your own yard. But she started on the side walk and moved back after he said something. The woman is just as ignorant as the officer. Point the spot light on her and be done with it Lol.

[Steve]

No worries, and thanks for clearing that up here and via PM. I have had to pass pretty extensive background/drug tests to gain employment in the past, so i know what you're saying. And for the record its not just suits but all types of higher end menswear......just in case anyone needs anything

Speaking of, you don't have a Linux background do you? This is that job I was telling about if you can pass the background.

[Pro88LX]

I am only meaning that if NY has a failure to obey lawful order law. Then his arrest would be legal technically. That is why I am saying charges against him would be pointless. That is all I was saying. I believe he should lose his job, as he does not need to be an officer. What he did was stupid and wrong.

but how is it a lawful order if she was legally standing in her yard filming?

[Machx2]

On what grounds was the arrest legal?

I am only meaning that if NY has a failure to obey lawful order law. Then his arrest would be legal technically. That is why I am saying charges against him would be pointless. That is all I was saying. I believe he should lose his job, as he does not need to be an officer. What he did was stupid and wrong.

[Grimpala]

You always take everything I say to heart. It has nothing to do with where I work. What charges are you going to place on him? He made a legal arrest as far as I see it, wasn't right, but it was legal. HE SHOULD NOT HAVE ARRESTED HER. Throwing that out there. Btw did you get that off the Dallas police page. Looks like Rochester does not require any. Doesn't mean he doesn't have any college.

On what grounds was the arrest legal?

[Machx2]

Lets see, she has to go to jail, post bond $, pay a lawyer $$ and have a criminal arrest on her record for the rest of her life.

He gets a paid vacation until the investigation is done, then a reprimand or at worst fired from a job that only takes 45 credit-hours with a minimum of a 2.0 gpa.

Considering your occupation, we can see why you have that opinion.

Stevo

You always take everything I say to heart. It has nothing to do with where I work. What charges are you going to place on him? He made a legal arrest as far as I see it, wasn't right, but it was legal. HE SHOULD NOT HAVE ARRESTED HER. Throwing that out there. Btw did you get that off the Dallas police page. Looks like Rochester does not require any. Doesn't mean he doesn't have any college.

[347Mike]

No worries, and thanks for clearing that up here and via PM. I have had to pass pretty extensive background/drug tests to gain employment in the past, so i know what you're saying. And for the record its not just suits but all types of higher end menswear......just in case anyone needs anything



that would be boring and short since every guy here has an exactly 14" cock.

If you can find a 2 button near my size I would be. My size is impossible to find.