Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

With the threat of an AWB coming up...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jester
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    Oh I'm not arguing that, I there's one thing you've said correctly about me its that I can have a fucking ego on here. Big time. This is the land of the players and pimps son.

    Unfortunately for you, you can't be a pimp and a prostitute too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by CJ View Post
    See, exactly what I'm talking about. Thank you very much for demonstrating your hypocrisy. If you didn't notice, that was a trap to use two similar yet completely unrelated terms. See how offensive that is?
    I dont know what the hell you're talking about, and neither do you. Backtracking like you set a trap. I'm pretty sure I've had the flir debates with you before and you're always wrong.

    Flir is often called night vision while that's technically not correct.

    Magazines are often called clips hole that's technically not correct.

    See the point?

    Only a stupidly anal person cares about either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trick Pony
    replied
    Ruffdaddy, you're just making yourself look like more of an idiot here. I didn't need to post that here, but I sure wanted to and there is an amemdment to the Consitution that gives me that right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Jester View Post
    Hi pot, im kettle!
    Oh I'm not arguing that, I there's one thing you've said correctly about me its that I can have a fucking ego on here. Big time. This is the land of the players and pimps son.

    Unfortunately for you, you can't be a pimp and a prostitute too.

    Leave a comment:


  • ELVIS
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike View Post
    Painful to admit this, but that was pretty funny.
    agreed. that was 100% solid!

    god bless.

    Leave a comment:


  • CJ
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    No because FLIR is thermal imaging retard. WTF are you talking about?
    See, exactly what I'm talking about. Thank you very much for demonstrating your hypocrisy. If you didn't notice, that was a trap to use two similar yet completely unrelated terms. See how offensive that is?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jester
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    You realize you exhibit all of those right?
    Hi pot, im kettle!

    Leave a comment:


  • Crownline79
    replied
    Wow "imprisoned not more than 10 years"... seems drastic.


    Text of S. 32 (112th): Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device … as of Jan. 25, 2011 (Introduced version). S. 32 (112th): Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    A BILL

    To prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ‘Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act’.


    SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.
    (a) Definition- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following:

    ‘(30) The term ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’--

    ‘(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but

    ‘(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.’.

    (b) Prohibitions- Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:

    ‘(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

    ‘(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

    ‘(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

    ‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--

    ‘(A) a manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);

    ‘(B) a transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;

    ‘(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement; or

    ‘(D) a manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.’.

    (c) Penalties- Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

    ‘(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.’.

    (d) Identification Markings- Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.’.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    You realize you exhibit all of those right?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jester
    replied
    Originally posted by Yale View Post
    Magazines are only called clips by the uninitiated. In fact, one of the reasons people who know the difference are so picky about it is because they do such different things. Calling a magazine a clip is like calling a truck a forklift.
    hey, they both have wheels!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by CJ View Post
    A proper comparison would have been thermal vs. flir. Nightvision is completely different. I do not see how this argument is proving your competance.
    No because FLIR is thermal imaging retard. WTF are you talking about?

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    Haha wow, you so thoroughly know my knowledge base.

    This is no different than night vision vs flir. Even in the industry people commonly refer to flir as NV. Again it's a commonly accepted term. I'm glad you chose this as the core of your argument.
    Magazines are only called clips by the uninitiated, and thus, do not represent legitimate vernacular, which is the word you were going for when you said, "accepted term." In fact, one of the reasons people who know the difference are so picky about it is because they do such different things. Calling a magazine a clip is like calling a truck a forklift.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jester
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • CJ
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    Haha wow, you so thoroughly know my knowledge base.

    This is no different than night vision vs flir. Even in the industry people commonly refer to flir as NV. Again it's a commonly accepted term. I'm glad you chose this as the core of your argument.
    A proper comparison would have been thermal vs. flir. Nightvision is completely different. I do not see how this argument is proving your competence. You see, this wouldn't be a conversation if you hadn't interjected yourself into the topic feigning knowledge of the subject. I wouldn't call out a housewife on saying "clip" because I know she doesn't know what she's talking about.

    Leave a comment:


  • CJ
    replied
    Originally posted by Cooter View Post
    Engineers are never nitpicky about using the correct terms for things
    Except when you don't understand the topic, then it's outdated.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X