Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

With the threat of an AWB coming up...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by CJ View Post
    I've never seen something so pathetic in my life. No, you just don't know the difference and you're flailing in ignorance with childish insults. We use words to define specific objects. A magazine is a specific object. A clip is a specific object. You are using the wrong term because you're uneducated on the subject. Just because many people like housewives and children are uneducated on the subject doesn't mean the term needs to be changed. People need to be educated, like yourself.
    Haha wow, you so thoroughly know my knowledge base.

    This is no different than night vision vs flir. Even in the industry people commonly refer to flir as NV. Again it's a commonly accepted term. I'm glad you chose this as the core of your argument.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cooter
    replied
    Engineers are never nitpicky about using the correct terms for things

    Leave a comment:


  • CJ
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    Lol at you thinking I dont know the correct term for it. You do realize its common nomenclature right? Meaning Merriam Webster changes the fucking definition because of that right? The clip/magazine argument is outdated and only makes people like you feel as of they have an elite knowledge.

    So why you so mad bro?
    I've never seen something so pathetic in my life. No, you just don't know the difference and you're flailing in ignorance with childish insults. We use words to define specific objects. A magazine is a specific object. A clip is a specific object. You are using the wrong term because you're uneducated on the subject. Just because many people like housewives and children are uneducated on the subject doesn't mean the term needs to be changed. People just need to be educated, like yourself. You are literally advocating ignorance now as a defense.
    Last edited by CJ; 01-04-2013, 10:34 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quadforce
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    Lol at you thinking I dont know the correct term for it. You do realize its common nomenclature right? Meaning Merriam Webster changes the fucking definition because of that right? The clip/magazine argument is outdated and only makes people like you feel as of they have an elite knowledge.

    So why you so mad bro?
    well MAGPUL make PMAGS not PCLIPS.. just saying. if you are in engineering back ground you understand that proabably 90% of the things engineered are for wants not needs. buildings do not have to be engineered for looks but they are. Cars do not have to be engineered for racing but they are these are thing we want but no one needs. IMO you are just in here trying to stir up shit and you look dumb doing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • motoman
    replied
    Originally posted by Crownline79 View Post
    Where is the text for this proposed hi cap magazine Bill. I havnt read it yet.


    Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
     120 specifically-named firearms
     Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a
    detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
     Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept
    more than 10 rounds
    Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
     Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
     Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from
    the characteristics test
     Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address
    attempts to “work around” prior bans
    Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than
    10 rounds.
    Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
     Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
     Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or
    sporting purposes and
     Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms
    Act, to include:
    o Background check of owner and any transferee;
    o Type and serial number of the firearm;
    o Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
    o Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that
    possession would not violate State or local law; and
    o Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    Dude use your head. I never said people shouldn't have them. I said to stop trying to justify the "need" for them because it doesn't exist and makes the entire group of gun owners look bad to non owners and those on the fence. Stop being so emotional on this shit. Responses need to be more calculated and hold merit. You don't have to explain why you exercise a right. But when you tell a person on the fence you need 30 rounds to hit a target that's not hunting you back, you sound crazy or unskilled.
    I don't own a single firearm, and gun owners don't look bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Crownline79 View Post
    Where is the text for this proposed hi cap magazine Bill. I havnt read it yet.
    All I've seen are summaries...there was a thread about it on here a few days ago. It'll never pass as is

    Leave a comment:


  • Crownline79
    replied
    Where is the text for this proposed hi cap magazine Bill. I havnt read it yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jester
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    Oh snap...an unemployed looney bin and a CJ are on the attack. If only I had 30rds of white trash comebacks!!!
    How does it feel to get your ass handed to you by just a couple of whitetrash loons?
    You dont have to answer because your way over inflated ego will never admit defeat.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by CJ View Post
    I didn't even realize he was the one who started this thread.

    Lol...I started a thread in the dfwm armory talking negativel about something several here are doing. You think I started out thinking it was gonna be a happy clam bake?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    Oh snap...an unemployed looney bin and a CJ are on the attack. If only I had 30rds of white trash comebacks!!!
    Painful to admit this, but that was pretty funny.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    Oh snap...an unemployed looney bin and a CJ are on the attack. If only I had 30rds of white trash comebacks!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruffdaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by CJ View Post
    It's called a magazine, not a clip. You possess so little knowledge of the topic you make errors I associate with housewives and children. This is why I think you don't know what you're talking about, because you factually do not know what you're talking about. You are proving yourself to be an idiot again, as you usually do.

    I like how you're using this childish "tacticool" word as you perceive it to be some sort of insult that will get you some sort of reaction to satisfy your ego. I find it absolutely hilarious you're questioning my knowledge of "current defense capabilities" when you don't even understand weapons created 70 years ago. You do not possess the necessary knowledge of guns to make the comments you do. You use these childish insults because you've embarrassed yourself.
    Lol at you thinking I dont know the correct term for it. You do realize its common nomenclature right? Meaning Merriam Webster changes the fucking definition because of that right? The clip/magazine argument is outdated and only makes people like you feel as of they have an elite knowledge.

    So why you so mad bro?

    Leave a comment:


  • CJ
    replied
    Originally posted by Jester View Post
    This little gem still cracks me up....

    Now go back and look at all of his horseshit he says on the first page.
    I didn't even realize he was the one who started this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jester
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
    I don't need it retard...lol. Have you read a single thing I posted?
    This little gem still cracks me up....

    Now go back and look at all of his horseshit he says on the first page.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X