Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"No refusal weekend"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The King
    replied
    Originally posted by Rick Modena View Post
    Do we have another welcher in our midst? I thought we banned this troll already?
    Nah, he pays his debts. Don will vouch for that.

    Your 100 buck bet has been laid out twilight boy, now pay up or as is more likely be known as a welcher along with being a common dumbfuck.

    Leave a comment:


  • sig239
    replied
    Originally posted by Lone Sailor View Post
    I believe the correct term you're trying to infer here is "couldn't care less". If you "could care less" then you not only care, you possess a measurable level of caring from which feeling could be subtracted.

    Also, "care less" is two words.
    Zing

    Leave a comment:


  • Rick Modena
    replied
    Originally posted by The King View Post
    Speaking of shit, pay up again dumbfuck twilight boy.
    Do we have another welcher in our midst? I thought we banned this troll already?

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Speaking of shit, pay up again dumbfuck twilight boy.

    Leave a comment:


  • TEAMJACOB
    replied
    Originally posted by mikec View Post
    Not really. Just wondering who the passive/aggressive chickenshit is. And I could careless about your approval, as you are commonly regarded as a bottom feeder.



    Possible.
    100 bucks says he is the piece of shit tagger.

    Leave a comment:


  • davbrucas
    replied
    Originally posted by JamisonFRC View Post
    I have yet to make a DWI arrest based on SFST evidence only to have them pass the breathalyzer/blood draw. In fact the closest to the legal limit I have personally arrested on was .104, I think.

    The no refusal warrants are just that, a search warrant signed by a judge. If a judge signs the warrant blindly, without the required PC, then the warrant will get thrown out. However, I don't see a judge risking his career on a Class B.

    Knowing what I know now, if I was pulled over for DWI by one of these dirty, constitution stomping, jack booted thugs ya'll speak of I would gladly do the SFSTs. If he decided I was intoxicated the first thing out of my mouth would be a request for a breathalyzer/blood draw. If you have not been drinking or taking drugs the blood draw will obviously prove it. The breathalyzer will not detect any drugs.

    Pretty easy. When the breathalyzer shows .000 its pretty hard to argue that you are under the influence of alcohol. If they want to say they suspect it is some type of drug then a blood test is the only way to prove it.
    A person cannot be booked for DUI based solely on the FST? The officer doesnt have to allow you to prove your innocence by letting you to give blood or do a breathalyzer exam. It would then be your word against the State...and we all know how that ends up.

    Leave a comment:


  • 89stangGT
    replied
    23 suspected DWI arrests in FW on New Years.

    One even happened to be an 18 year old kid that ran into someone's house and hit the bed they were asleep in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Relinquished
    replied
    Originally posted by GE View Post


    Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • GE
    replied
    Originally posted by Relinquished View Post
    This thread sucks with no mugshot

    Leave a comment:


  • JamisonFRC
    replied
    I have yet to make a DWI arrest based on SFST evidence only to have them pass the breathalyzer/blood draw. In fact the closest to the legal limit I have personally arrested on was .104, I think.

    The no refusal warrants are just that, a search warrant signed by a judge. If a judge signs the warrant blindly, without the required PC, then the warrant will get thrown out. However, I don't see a judge risking his career on a Class B.

    Knowing what I know now, if I was pulled over for DWI by one of these dirty, constitution stomping, jack booted thugs ya'll speak of I would gladly do the SFSTs. If he decided I was intoxicated the first thing out of my mouth would be a request for a breathalyzer/blood draw. If you have not been drinking or taking drugs the blood draw will obviously prove it. The breathalyzer will not detect any drugs.

    Pretty easy. When the breathalyzer shows .000 its pretty hard to argue that you are under the influence of alcohol. If they want to say they suspect it is some type of drug then a blood test is the only way to prove it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lone Sailor
    replied
    Originally posted by mikec View Post
    Not really. Just wondering who the passive/aggressive chickenshit is. And I could careless about your approval, as you are commonly regarded as a bottom feeder.



    Possible.
    I believe the correct term you're trying to infer here is "couldn't care less". If you "could care less" then you not only care, you possess a measurable level of caring from which feeling could be subtracted.

    Also, "care less" is two words.

    Leave a comment:


  • Relinquished
    replied
    This thread sucks with no mugshot

    Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Leah
    replied
    Originally posted by mikec View Post
    Not really. Just wondering who the passive/aggressive chickenshit is.
    Isn't it possible they are doing it out of fun? Don't always think people are out to get you.

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Originally posted by mikec View Post
    Not really. Just wondering who the passive/aggressive chickenshit is. And I could careless about your approval, as you are commonly regarded as a bottom feeder.
    Oh yeah he be gettin' all madd now, LOL.

    Look out chickenshit tagger, whoever you are.....mikec is on your ass!

    Leave a comment:


  • mikec
    replied
    Originally posted by The King View Post
    Must be bothering you a lot, so whoever posted that tag gets my stamp of approval.
    Not really. Just wondering who the passive/aggressive chickenshit is. And I could careless about your approval, as you are commonly regarded as a bottom feeder.

    Originally posted by vadertt View Post
    Maybe it's a different "mikec"?
    Possible.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X