Took the jump for 4:56's.

[91CoupeMike]

I just caught the edit.
Radials? Where your street tires bias ply? 2.0 isn't bad for a street tire unless they were drag radials. What did it run with a 2.0? Your mph can help you determine where your 60ft should be.

1.7 is doable on stock suspension with lowers and slicks. You shouldn't have a problem.

The 2.0 was a old shitty bald 275/50/15 nitto drag radial.

2.24 was a 225/55/16 kuhmo street tire.

It traps right around 77-80mph every time.

I attempted the track when it was cold to see what it would run with the 3.73s. It was humid, cold and I had bald tires. I ran a 9.6 @ 76mph, catching no grip. I would lift completely and get back in it to only spin more. Horrible day.

[Denny]

This car has never seen a decent pair of tires at the track.

The 2.24 60ft I ran a 9.01@ 79mph

The 2.0-2.1ish was 8.97@79mph.

When I had the radials, I was straight dumping the clutch. (dumb) 2.73s that doesn't work well.. Live and learn.

Yes, I do need to work on my pedaling.

I've got a set of 255 DRs sitting on some chrome ponies. They're currently on my car in the garage. If you want to make a couple of passes, go get them.

[Jimbo]

This car has never seen a decent pair of tires at the track.

The 2.24 60ft I ran a 9.01@ 79mph

The 2.0-2.1ish was 8.97@79mph.

When I had the radials, I was straight dumping the clutch. (dumb) 2.73s that doesn't work well.. Live and learn.

Yes, I do need to work on my pedaling.

79 is good for stock, you can cut 1.8's all day with a 79mph car. You don't need a bunch of extras, just good control arms and tires.

[Denny]

Less tire at the track, he does not need a 315 drag radial, that's ridiculous to think he does.

A 315 street tire, sure it'll look good. But that wide of a sticky tire is not nessacery.

And did you notice I never said anything about him needing it? What if that is his only tire and he wants to have a badass look, but occasionally go to the track?

Too bad he can't donate some rubber to you, John Force.

[Diabolic]

what tires?

Falken's

[Jimbo]

2.24 on 2.73 and 225 street tires last time out.

When I had a pair of radials it was 2.0-2.1.

It now has gears, and hopefully with full drag suspension I can get 1.8 or better.

I'd like a 1.7, but I don't see that with stock power.

I just caught the edit.
Radials? Where your street tires bias ply? 2.0 isn't bad for a street tire unless they were drag radials. What did it run with a 2.0? Your mph can help you determine where your 60ft should be.

1.7 is doable on stock suspension with lowers and slicks. You shouldn't have a problem.

[91CoupeMike]

I never said that. Better check your reading again. LMAO!!! One kid was telling another kid that he needed less tire and asked why he had 315s. I chimed in on his part by saying it looks good like that.

LMAO @ idiots trying to call people idiots!!!

Less tire at the track, he does not need a 315 drag radial, that's ridiculous to think he does.

A 315 street tire, sure it'll look good. But that wide of a sticky tire is not nessacery.

[Denny]

i mostly came to that conclusion when he told the poor 17 year old he needed a 315 tire for his stock car.. after rereading he has a couple valid points about the coupe kid and the cobra kid not being so bright.
my reading comprehesion is fine, my memory not so much!

I never said that. Better check your reading again. LMAO!!! One kid was telling another kid that he needed less tire and asked why he had 315s. I chimed in on his part by saying it looks good like that.

LMAO @ idiots trying to call people idiots!!!

[91CoupeMike]

Good god, you need to learn to pedal it before buying all those suspension parts. What did it run?

This car has never seen a decent pair of tires at the track.

The 2.24 60ft I ran a 9.01@ 79mph

The 2.0-2.1ish was 8.97@79mph.

When I had the radials, I was straight dumping the clutch. (dumb) 2.73s that doesn't work well.. Live and learn.

Yes, I do need to work on my pedaling.

[Jimbo]

i mostly came to that conclusion when he told the poor 17 year old he needed a 315 tire for his stock car..

Just as I thought, you didn't understand what those comments meant.

after rereading he has a couple valid points about the coupe kid and the cobra kid not being so bright.

Re-reading because you did not comprehend, check.

my reading comprehesion is fine, my memory not so much!.

I'll wager both are a little off.

[matts5.0]

In that case, you come off as someone who can't comprehend what he reads.

i mostly came to that conclusion when he told the poor 17 year old he needed a 315 tire for his stock car.. after rereading he has a couple valid points about the coupe kid and the cobra kid not being so bright.
my reading comprehesion is fine, my memory not so much!

[Jimbo]

2.24 on 2.73 and 225 street tires last time out.

When I had a pair of radials it was 2.0-2.1.

Good god, you need to learn to pedal it before buying all those suspension parts. What did it run?

[Jimbo]

denny i dont know if you are aware of this but you kinda come off ass an idiot.

In that case, you come off as someone who can't comprehend what he reads.

[91CoupeMike]

What does it 60ft now?

2.24 on 2.73 and 225 street tires last time out.

When I had a pair of radials it was 2.0-2.1.

It now has gears, and hopefully with full drag suspension I can get 1.8 or better.

I'd like a 1.7, but I don't see that with stock power.

[Denny]

that right there say's a lot.. cant even take constructive critisism

So you have no clue? Gotcha. Just saying that someone comes off as an idiot isn't criticism, it's just name calling. Just like me saying you come off as a faggot, faggot.