Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
When they come for your guns . . . You will turn them over
Collapse
X
-
I never have seen a MK 19 that wasn't either broken or broke within 100 rounds of use.
-

I'm to be afraid of THAT? What is this, the 80's?

these break down on their own. You really don't have to do anything.

And these, you cover the windows with paint and you have just disabled a multi million dollar truck.
Next?
Leave a comment:
-
Now that, I agree with you DS. I still want to hear this super tech stuff. And the only people who thinks our equipment works are people who have never used it. Super duper body armor. Fuck he's stupid.
Leave a comment:
-
No super new weapons I know of and I am pretty current. Like I said I have no worries about American military, or LE trying to disarm our citizens. I believe that the Muslim Kenyan will do everything within his powers to make gun ownership a nightmare, Banning certain weapons and magazines, banning certain ammunitions and possibly even certain calibers. Then he will tax the living shit out of everything that wasnt banned. But that is honestly all I see him doing.Originally posted by Forever_frost View PostSorry about that. It was WW1, I stand corrected. I want to know what super new weapons we have. The MK19 is neat but I can tell you I've never used it against a person. And Geneva prevents 50 use against a person.
Leave a comment:
-
Ok, besides Iraq and Syria. I'm talking throughout history has the military ever just been known to go into cities and round up people? I'm racking my brain here.Originally posted by DallasSleeper View Postjw33, many nations have. Syria is doing it right now, Libya was a few months ago. Hell Saddam used Chemical warfare on his own people. But those are all 3rd world shit holes. The difference here is our citizens are a LOT better armed.
Leave a comment:
-
Egypt did it, England did it repeatedly, Germany...Originally posted by DallasSleeper View Postjw33, many nations have. Syria is doing it right now, Libya was a few months ago. Hell Saddam used Chemical warfare on his own people. But those are all 3rd world shit holes. The difference here is our citizens are a LOT better armed.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, you aim for 'equipment', I know. What I'm saying is we can't kill Afghanis because of ROE. Does someone really think there wouldn't be hellacious ROE on our own soil?
Leave a comment:
-
I'm going to be serious for moment. You of all people know that means jack shit...Originally posted by Forever_frost View PostSorry about that. It was WW1, I stand corrected. I want to know what super new weapons we have. The MK19 is neat but I can tell you I've never used it against a person. And Geneva prevents 50 use against a person.
Leave a comment:
-
jw33, many nations have. Syria is doing it right now, Libya was a few months ago. Hell Saddam used Chemical warfare on his own people. But those are all 3rd world shit holes. The difference here is our citizens are a LOT better armed.
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry about that. It was WW1, I stand corrected. I want to know what super new weapons we have. The MK19 is neat but I can tell you I've never used it against a person. And Geneva prevents 50 use against a person.Originally posted by DallasSleeper View PostEasier said than done.
WWI
Other than those 2 things I agree fully, plus I do not see our military following orders to attack American towns or citizens. Same with most police forces. If they genuinely wanted to attempt to disarm our citizens then they would have to use UN troops. Like we both know they would have their hands full. The only thing different about an insurgency here and what we faced in Iraq would be that it is a lot more difficult for us to gain access to explosives and RPGs. Over there you could find that stuff everywhere. But on our homefront Americans can shoot a hell of a lot better than the other insurgents in the world.
Leave a comment:
-
Iraq.Originally posted by jw33 View PostI think it is absolutely impossible. Has a nation ever used its own military against citizens?
Leave a comment:
-
I think it is absolutely impossible. Has a nation ever used its own military against citizens?
Leave a comment:
-
And the UN has zero troops. They only have what member nations allow them. And every country on earth knows you aim for the sky blue helmets. It's brilliant. One second..
This is how intimidating UN troops are. Oh, and what nation have ANY UN troops ever pacified?
Leave a comment:
-
I would not follow a order to disarm all Americans. They are going to imprison me for resigning? Yea right.Originally posted by dville_gt View PostAre you serious? You think you represent the norm in this country? Sorry bud, you don't, you are a 1%'er at best and as we just saw in the last election, folks are more then willing to sacrifice their freedoms for the illusion of safety. Whatever weakness the military has, you have x10000, you know how much easier it'd be to take out your Blazer then it is to take out their tanks? Oh, and saying the military or cops wouldn't follow orders, even if that meant taking out American life's, again, I believe the orders would be followed and those who chose to disobey them would be imprisoned.
If it makes you feel better to believe the rest of the country thinks like you do, by all means continue, but you are very mistaken.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: